A methodological systematic review of what’s wrong with meta-ethnography reporting

E.F. France; N. Ring; R. Thomas; J. Noyes; M. Maxwell; R. Jepson

doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-119

A methodological systematic review of what’s wrong with meta-ethnography reporting

E.F. France
, N. Ring
, R. Thomas
, J. Noyes
, M. Maxwell
, R. Jepson

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolyn › Erthygl › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid

Crynodeb

Syntheses of qualitative studies can inform health policy, services and our understanding of patient experience. Meta-ethnography is a systematic seven-phase interpretive qualitative synthesis approach well-suited to producing new theories and conceptual models. However, there are concerns about the quality of meta-ethnography reporting, particularly the analysis and synthesis processes. Our aim was to investigate the application and reporting of methods in recent meta-ethnography journal papers, focusing on the analysis and synthesis process and output.

Iaith wreiddiol	Saesneg
Nifer y tudalennau	16
Cyfnodolyn	BMC Medical Research Methodology
Cyfrol	14
Rhif cyhoeddi	119
Dynodwyr Gwrthrych Digidol (DOIs)	https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-119
Statws	Cyhoeddwyd - 19 Tach 2014

NDC y CU

Mae’r allbwn hwn yn cyfrannu at y Nod(au) Datblygu Cynaliadwy canlynol

NDC 3 Iechyd a Llesiant Da

Mynediad at Ddogfen

10.1186/1471-2288-14-119

Dyfynnu hyn

@article{129f3f70dcba47b38b5d956c09a069f3,

title = "A methodological systematic review of what{\textquoteright}s wrong with meta-ethnography reporting",

abstract = "Syntheses of qualitative studies can inform health policy, services and our understanding of patient experience. Meta-ethnography is a systematic seven-phase interpretive qualitative synthesis approach well-suited to producing new theories and conceptual models. However, there are concerns about the quality of meta-ethnography reporting, particularly the analysis and synthesis processes. Our aim was to investigate the application and reporting of methods in recent meta-ethnography journal papers, focusing on the analysis and synthesis process and output.",

author = "E.F. France and N. Ring and R. Thomas and J. Noyes and M. Maxwell and R. Jepson",

year = "2014",

month = nov,

day = "19",

doi = "10.1186/1471-2288-14-119",

language = "English",

volume = "14",

journal = "BMC Medical Research Methodology",

issn = "1471-2288",

publisher = "Springer Verlag",

number = "119",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A methodological systematic review of what’s wrong with meta-ethnography reporting

AU - France, E.F.

AU - Ring, N.

AU - Thomas, R.

AU - Noyes, J.

AU - Maxwell, M.

AU - Jepson, R.

PY - 2014/11/19

Y1 - 2014/11/19

N2 - Syntheses of qualitative studies can inform health policy, services and our understanding of patient experience. Meta-ethnography is a systematic seven-phase interpretive qualitative synthesis approach well-suited to producing new theories and conceptual models. However, there are concerns about the quality of meta-ethnography reporting, particularly the analysis and synthesis processes. Our aim was to investigate the application and reporting of methods in recent meta-ethnography journal papers, focusing on the analysis and synthesis process and output.

AB - Syntheses of qualitative studies can inform health policy, services and our understanding of patient experience. Meta-ethnography is a systematic seven-phase interpretive qualitative synthesis approach well-suited to producing new theories and conceptual models. However, there are concerns about the quality of meta-ethnography reporting, particularly the analysis and synthesis processes. Our aim was to investigate the application and reporting of methods in recent meta-ethnography journal papers, focusing on the analysis and synthesis process and output.

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2288-14-119

DO - 10.1186/1471-2288-14-119

M3 - Article

SN - 1471-2288

VL - 14

JO - BMC Medical Research Methodology

JF - BMC Medical Research Methodology

IS - 119

ER -

A methodological systematic review of what’s wrong with meta-ethnography reporting

Crynodeb

NDC y CU

Mynediad at Ddogfen

Ôl bys

Dyfynnu hyn