AHRQ Series on Complex Intervention Systematic Reviews - Paper 2: Defining Complexity, Formulating Scope and Questions

Michael P Kelly; Jane Noyes; Robert L Kane; Christine Chang; Stacey Uhl; Karen A Robinson; Stacey Springs; Mary E Butler; Jeanne-Marie Guise

doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.012

AHRQ Series on Complex Intervention Systematic Reviews - Paper 2: Defining Complexity, Formulating Scope and Questions

Michael P Kelly
, Jane Noyes
, Robert L Kane
, Christine Chang
, Stacey Uhl
, Karen A Robinson
, Stacey Springs
, Mary E Butler
, Jeanne-Marie Guise

Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
University of Minnesota, USA
AHRQ’s Evidence-based Practice Center, Rockville, MD
ECRI Institute, Plymouth Meeting, PA
Johns Hopkins University
Brown School of Public Health, Providence, RI
University of Oregon Health Sciences Center, Portland

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolyn › Erthygl › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid

202 Wedi eu Llwytho i Lawr (Pure)

Crynodeb

BACKGROUND: The early stages of a systematic review set the scope and expectations. This can be particularly challenging for complex interventions given their multi-dimensional and dynamic nature.

RATIONALE: This paper builds on concepts introduced in Paper 1 of this series. It describes the methodological, practical and philosophical challenges and potential approaches for formulating the questions and scope of systematic reviews of complex interventions. Further it discusses the use of theory to help organize reviews of complex interventions.

DISCUSSION: Many interventions in medicine, public health, education, social services, behavioral health, and community programs are complex, and they may not fit neatly within the established paradigm for reviews of straight-forward interventions. This paper provides conceptual and operational guidance for these early stages of scope formulation to assist authors of systematic reviews of complex interventions.

Iaith wreiddiol	Saesneg
Tudalennau (o-i)	11-18
Cyfnodolyn	Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Cyfrol	90
Rhif cyhoeddi	October
Dyddiad ar-lein cynnar	15 Gorff 2017
Dynodwyr Gwrthrych Digidol (DOIs)	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.012
Statws	Cyhoeddwyd - Hyd 2017

NDC y CU

Mae’r allbwn hwn yn cyfrannu at y Nod(au) Datblygu Cynaliadwy canlynol

NDC 3 Iechyd a Llesiant Da

Mynediad at Ddogfen

10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.012Trwydded: CC BY-NC-ND

AHRQ series Paper 2Llawysgrif awdur wedi’i dderbyn, 534 KBTrwydded: CC BY-NC-ND

Dyfynnu hyn

@article{03b00df7ad0a47d2b254453ee801e8b1,

title = "AHRQ Series on Complex Intervention Systematic Reviews - Paper 2: Defining Complexity, Formulating Scope and Questions",

abstract = "BACKGROUND: The early stages of a systematic review set the scope and expectations. This can be particularly challenging for complex interventions given their multi-dimensional and dynamic nature.RATIONALE: This paper builds on concepts introduced in Paper 1 of this series. It describes the methodological, practical and philosophical challenges and potential approaches for formulating the questions and scope of systematic reviews of complex interventions. Further it discusses the use of theory to help organize reviews of complex interventions.DISCUSSION: Many interventions in medicine, public health, education, social services, behavioral health, and community programs are complex, and they may not fit neatly within the established paradigm for reviews of straight-forward interventions. This paper provides conceptual and operational guidance for these early stages of scope formulation to assist authors of systematic reviews of complex interventions.",

keywords = "Complex interventions, Evidence-Based Medicine, Review Literature as Topic, Systematic review, Qualitative Research, Research Design",

author = "Kelly, \{Michael P\} and Jane Noyes and Kane, \{Robert L\} and Christine Chang and Stacey Uhl and Robinson, \{Karen A\} and Stacey Springs and Butler, \{Mary E\} and Jeanne-Marie Guise",

note = "This work was funded by the following contract HHSA290201200004C",

year = "2017",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.012",

language = "English",

volume = "90",

pages = "11--18",

journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",

issn = "0895-4356",

publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

number = "October",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - AHRQ Series on Complex Intervention Systematic Reviews - Paper 2

T2 - Defining Complexity, Formulating Scope and Questions

AU - Kelly, Michael P

AU - Noyes, Jane

AU - Kane, Robert L

AU - Chang, Christine

AU - Uhl, Stacey

AU - Robinson, Karen A

AU - Springs, Stacey

AU - Butler, Mary E

AU - Guise, Jeanne-Marie

N1 - This work was funded by the following contract HHSA290201200004C

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - BACKGROUND: The early stages of a systematic review set the scope and expectations. This can be particularly challenging for complex interventions given their multi-dimensional and dynamic nature.RATIONALE: This paper builds on concepts introduced in Paper 1 of this series. It describes the methodological, practical and philosophical challenges and potential approaches for formulating the questions and scope of systematic reviews of complex interventions. Further it discusses the use of theory to help organize reviews of complex interventions.DISCUSSION: Many interventions in medicine, public health, education, social services, behavioral health, and community programs are complex, and they may not fit neatly within the established paradigm for reviews of straight-forward interventions. This paper provides conceptual and operational guidance for these early stages of scope formulation to assist authors of systematic reviews of complex interventions.

AB - BACKGROUND: The early stages of a systematic review set the scope and expectations. This can be particularly challenging for complex interventions given their multi-dimensional and dynamic nature.RATIONALE: This paper builds on concepts introduced in Paper 1 of this series. It describes the methodological, practical and philosophical challenges and potential approaches for formulating the questions and scope of systematic reviews of complex interventions. Further it discusses the use of theory to help organize reviews of complex interventions.DISCUSSION: Many interventions in medicine, public health, education, social services, behavioral health, and community programs are complex, and they may not fit neatly within the established paradigm for reviews of straight-forward interventions. This paper provides conceptual and operational guidance for these early stages of scope formulation to assist authors of systematic reviews of complex interventions.

KW - Complex interventions

KW - Evidence-Based Medicine

KW - Review Literature as Topic

KW - Systematic review

KW - Qualitative Research

KW - Research Design

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.012

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.012

M3 - Article

C2 - 28720514

SN - 0895-4356

VL - 90

SP - 11

EP - 18

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

IS - October

ER -

AHRQ Series on Complex Intervention Systematic Reviews - Paper 2: Defining Complexity, Formulating Scope and Questions

Crynodeb

NDC y CU

Mynediad at Ddogfen

Ôl bys

Dyfynnu hyn