Authority and Subject (in the Archaeological Discourse in Austria and Germany)

Raimund Karl

doi:10.1007/s11759-020-09393-9

Authority and Subject (in the Archaeological Discourse in Austria and Germany)

Raimund Karl

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolyn › Erthygl › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid

131 Wedi eu Llwytho i Lawr (Pure)

Crynodeb

The primary task of archaeological heritage management is to represent the public interest in archaeology. How this is constituted and determined has changed significantly over the past 200 years. As this paper demonstrates, a modern, egalitarian, democratic approach has yet to be established within Austrian and German archaeological heritage management: the relationship between heritage management bureaucracy and the civic subject is anachronistic, stuck in a pre-1848 Revolution mindset. Due to the lack of a public discourse and the nature of scholarly engagement with archaeological heritage management, the power of (state) archaeologists is not imaginary, but very real.

Iaith wreiddiol	Saesneg
Tudalennau (o-i)	137-158
Nifer y tudalennau	22
Cyfnodolyn	Archaeologies - Journal of the World archaeology Congress
Cyfrol	16
Rhif cyhoeddi	1
Dyddiad ar-lein cynnar	5 Maw 2020
Dynodwyr Gwrthrych Digidol (DOIs)	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-020-09393-9
Statws	Cyhoeddwyd - Ebr 2020
Digwyddiad	23rd annual meeting of the European Association of Archaeologists: Building Bridges - MECC, Maastricht, Yr Iseldiroedd Hyd: 30 Awst 2017 → 3 Medi 2017 http://www.eaa2017maastricht.nl/

Mynediad at Ddogfen

10.1007/s11759-020-09393-9Trwydded: CC BY

2020 Authority and SubjectFersiwn derfynol wedi’i chyhoeddi, 423 KBTrwydded: CC BY

2 Erthygl
1 Cyfraniad Arall

Kulturgüterschutz und Rechtsmissbrauch
Karl, R., 4 Maw 2020, 56 t. Archäologische Denkmalpflege.
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad arall › Cyfraniad Arall

Mynediad agored
Ffeil
Authorities and subjects? The legal framework for public participation in Austrian archaeology
Karl, R., 26 Mai 2019, Yn: European Journal of Postclassical Archaeologies. 9, t. 219-256
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolyn › Erthygl › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid

Mynediad agored
Ffeil
Obrigkeit und Untertan im denkmalpflegerischen Diskurs: Standesdenken als Barriere für eine Citizen Science?
Karl, R., Chwef 2016, Yn: Forum kritische Archäologie. 5, t. 1-15 15 t.
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolyn › Erthygl › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid

Mynediad agored

Dyfynnu hyn

@article{6b6c7fda7f4c4509a66e44846ab9fce3,

title = "Authority and Subject (in the Archaeological Discourse in Austria and Germany)",

abstract = "The primary task of archaeological heritage management is to represent the public interest in archaeology. How this is constituted and determined has changed significantly over the past 200 years. As this paper demonstrates, a modern, egalitarian, democratic approach has yet to be established within Austrian and German archaeological heritage management: the relationship between heritage management bureaucracy and the civic subject is anachronistic, stuck in a pre-1848 Revolution mindset. Due to the lack of a public discourse and the nature of scholarly engagement with archaeological heritage management, the power of (state) archaeologists is not imaginary, but very real.",

keywords = "ARCHAEOLOGY, Heritage, Heritage law, Heritage management",

author = "Raimund Karl",

year = "2020",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1007/s11759-020-09393-9",

language = "English",

volume = "16",

pages = "137--158",

journal = "Archaeologies - Journal of the World archaeology Congress",

issn = "1555-8622",

publisher = "Springer New York",

number = "1",

note = "23rd annual meeting of the European Association of Archaeologists : Building Bridges ; Conference date: 30-08-2017 Through 03-09-2017",

url = "http://www.eaa2017maastricht.nl/",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Authority and Subject (in the Archaeological Discourse in Austria and Germany)

AU - Karl, Raimund

PY - 2020/4

Y1 - 2020/4

N2 - The primary task of archaeological heritage management is to represent the public interest in archaeology. How this is constituted and determined has changed significantly over the past 200 years. As this paper demonstrates, a modern, egalitarian, democratic approach has yet to be established within Austrian and German archaeological heritage management: the relationship between heritage management bureaucracy and the civic subject is anachronistic, stuck in a pre-1848 Revolution mindset. Due to the lack of a public discourse and the nature of scholarly engagement with archaeological heritage management, the power of (state) archaeologists is not imaginary, but very real.

AB - The primary task of archaeological heritage management is to represent the public interest in archaeology. How this is constituted and determined has changed significantly over the past 200 years. As this paper demonstrates, a modern, egalitarian, democratic approach has yet to be established within Austrian and German archaeological heritage management: the relationship between heritage management bureaucracy and the civic subject is anachronistic, stuck in a pre-1848 Revolution mindset. Due to the lack of a public discourse and the nature of scholarly engagement with archaeological heritage management, the power of (state) archaeologists is not imaginary, but very real.

KW - ARCHAEOLOGY

KW - Heritage

KW - Heritage law

KW - Heritage management

U2 - 10.1007/s11759-020-09393-9

DO - 10.1007/s11759-020-09393-9

M3 - Article

SN - 1555-8622

VL - 16

SP - 137

EP - 158

JO - Archaeologies - Journal of the World archaeology Congress

JF - Archaeologies - Journal of the World archaeology Congress

IS - 1

T2 - 23rd annual meeting of the European Association of Archaeologists

Y2 - 30 August 2017 through 3 September 2017

ER -

Authority and Subject (in the Archaeological Discourse in Austria and Germany)

Crynodeb

Mynediad at Ddogfen

Ôl bys

Allbwn Ymchwil

Kulturgüterschutz und Rechtsmissbrauch

Authorities and subjects? The legal framework for public participation in Austrian archaeology

Obrigkeit und Untertan im denkmalpflegerischen Diskurs: Standesdenken als Barriere für eine Citizen Science?

Dyfynnu hyn