Case Comment: Martin v Kogan

Mark Hyland; Michael Howard

Case Comment: Martin v Kogan

Mark Hyland
, Michael Howard

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolyn › Erthygl

489 Wedi eu Llwytho i Lawr (Pure)

Crynodeb

Comments on Martin v Kogan (IPEC), setting out the applicable tests for joint authorship, and accordingly, whether the defendant's contribution rendered her joint author of the claimant's screenplay. Considers the case's contribution to determining what is "substantial" for the purposes of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 s.10(1) and its consequences for the creative industries and practitioners in the field.

Iaith wreiddiol	Saesneg
Tudalennau (o-i)	817-820
Cyfnodolyn	European Intellectual Property Review
Cyfrol	40
Rhif cyhoeddi	12
Statws	Cyhoeddwyd - Rhag 2018

Mynediad at Ddogfen

2018 Martin v KoganLlawysgrif awdur wedi’i dderbyn, 433 KBTrwydded: CC BY-NC

Dyfynnu hyn

@article{d951c582d680447f80c4f13900c641de,

title = "Case Comment: Martin v Kogan",

abstract = "Comments on Martin v Kogan (IPEC), setting out the applicable tests for joint authorship, and accordingly, whether the defendant's contribution rendered her joint author of the claimant's screenplay. Considers the case's contribution to determining what is {"}substantial{"} for the purposes of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 s.10(1) and its consequences for the creative industries and practitioners in the field.",

keywords = "Joint Authorship, Test for Control, Copyright",

author = "Mark Hyland and Michael Howard",

year = "2018",

month = dec,

language = "English",

volume = "40",

pages = "817--820",

journal = "European Intellectual Property Review",

issn = "0142-0461",

publisher = "Sweet and Maxwell",

number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Case Comment: Martin v Kogan

AU - Hyland, Mark

AU - Howard, Michael

PY - 2018/12

Y1 - 2018/12

N2 - Comments on Martin v Kogan (IPEC), setting out the applicable tests for joint authorship, and accordingly, whether the defendant's contribution rendered her joint author of the claimant's screenplay. Considers the case's contribution to determining what is "substantial" for the purposes of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 s.10(1) and its consequences for the creative industries and practitioners in the field.

AB - Comments on Martin v Kogan (IPEC), setting out the applicable tests for joint authorship, and accordingly, whether the defendant's contribution rendered her joint author of the claimant's screenplay. Considers the case's contribution to determining what is "substantial" for the purposes of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 s.10(1) and its consequences for the creative industries and practitioners in the field.

KW - Joint Authorship

KW - Test for Control

KW - Copyright

M3 - Article

SN - 0142-0461

VL - 40

SP - 817

EP - 820

JO - European Intellectual Property Review

JF - European Intellectual Property Review

IS - 12

ER -

Case Comment: Martin v Kogan

Crynodeb

Mynediad at Ddogfen

Ôl bys

Dyfynnu hyn