Die Anwendungsgrenzen des § 11 Abs. 1 DMSG

Raimund Karl

Die Anwendungsgrenzen des § 11 Abs. 1 DMSG

Raimund Karl

Allbwn ymchwil: Ffurf annhestunol › Safe Gwe / Cyhoeddiad Gwe

80 Wedi eu Llwytho i Lawr (Pure)

Crynodeb

Both archaeologists and the wider public require certainty as to how archaeological heritage law is to be interpreted. In this contribution, I prove that the interpretation of § 11 (1) Austrian Monuments Protection Law (DMSG) currently applied by the Austrian National Heritage Agency (BDA) must be illegal, since it would seriously breach the Austrian constitution, especially Art. 17 Staatsgrundgesetz (StGG). It is argued that there is only one other possible and legal interpretation of the provisions of § 11 (1) DMSG. It is recommended the BDA immediately chances its policy and practice to avoid becoming liable to massive damages.

Cyfieithiad o deitl y cyfraniad	The limits of applicability of § 11 (1) DMSG
Iaith wreiddiol	Almaeneg
Cyhoeddwr	Internationales Österreichisches Archäologie Forum
Statws	Cyhoeddwyd - 9 Gorff 2016

Mynediad at Ddogfen

Die Anwendungsgrenzen des § 11 Abs 1 DMSGFersiwn derfynol wedi’i chyhoeddi, 197 KBTrwydded: CC BY-NC

http://archaeologieforum.at/index.php/beitraege/25-forschungsberichte/7100-die-anwendungsgrenzen-des-11-abs-1-dmsg

3 Erthygl
3 Cyfraniad Arall
1 Llyfr
1 Pennod
Mwy
- 1 Safe Gwe / Cyhoeddiad Gwe

Rechtswidrige Denkmalpflege: Eine (nicht nur österreichische) Realsatire über archäologische NFG-Pflichten; deren gesetzliche Grenzen; und die staatliche Denkmalpflege
Karl, R., 30 Meh 2019, Bangor: Archäologische Denkmalpflege. 446 t. (Archäologische Denkmalpflege, Sonderbände; Cyfrol 2)
Allbwn ymchwil: Llyfr/Adroddiad › Llyfr

Mynediad agored
Ffeil
Ein Vorschlag für neue archäologische Denkmalschutzbestimmungen für Österreich.
Karl, R., 8 Chwef 2018, 10 t.
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad arall › Cyfraniad Arall

Mynediad agored
Ffeil
Führerschein oder Einzelfahrerlaubnis? Ein Vergleich von Genehmigungspflichten für Straßenverkehr und Nachforschungen
Karl, R., 2018, Yn: Archäologische Informationen. 41, t. 289-303
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolyn › Erthygl › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid

Mynediad agored
Ffeil

Dyfynnu hyn

@misc{7bc3f7793f6046299dc1d2e3d00b593f,

title = "Die Anwendungsgrenzen des § 11 Abs. 1 DMSG",

abstract = "Both archaeologists and the wider public require certainty as to how archaeological heritage law is to be interpreted. In this contribution, I prove that the interpretation of § 11 (1) Austrian Monuments Protection Law (DMSG) currently applied by the Austrian National Heritage Agency (BDA) must be illegal, since it would seriously breach the Austrian constitution, especially Art. 17 Staatsgrundgesetz (StGG). It is argued that there is only one other possible and legal interpretation of the provisions of § 11 (1) DMSG. It is recommended the BDA immediately chances its policy and practice to avoid becoming liable to massive damages.",

keywords = "ARCHAEOLOGY, Heritage management, heritage law, Austria, National Heritage Agency, Constitutional law, Civil rights, Human rights, academic freedom, policy",

author = "Raimund Karl",

year = "2016",

month = jul,

day = "9",

language = "Almaeneg",

publisher = "Internationales {\"O}sterreichisches Arch{\"a}ologie Forum",

}

TY - ADVS

T1 - Die Anwendungsgrenzen des § 11 Abs. 1 DMSG

AU - Karl, Raimund

PY - 2016/7/9

Y1 - 2016/7/9

N2 - Both archaeologists and the wider public require certainty as to how archaeological heritage law is to be interpreted. In this contribution, I prove that the interpretation of § 11 (1) Austrian Monuments Protection Law (DMSG) currently applied by the Austrian National Heritage Agency (BDA) must be illegal, since it would seriously breach the Austrian constitution, especially Art. 17 Staatsgrundgesetz (StGG). It is argued that there is only one other possible and legal interpretation of the provisions of § 11 (1) DMSG. It is recommended the BDA immediately chances its policy and practice to avoid becoming liable to massive damages.

AB - Both archaeologists and the wider public require certainty as to how archaeological heritage law is to be interpreted. In this contribution, I prove that the interpretation of § 11 (1) Austrian Monuments Protection Law (DMSG) currently applied by the Austrian National Heritage Agency (BDA) must be illegal, since it would seriously breach the Austrian constitution, especially Art. 17 Staatsgrundgesetz (StGG). It is argued that there is only one other possible and legal interpretation of the provisions of § 11 (1) DMSG. It is recommended the BDA immediately chances its policy and practice to avoid becoming liable to massive damages.

KW - ARCHAEOLOGY

KW - Heritage management

KW - heritage law

KW - Austria

KW - National Heritage Agency

KW - Constitutional law

KW - Civil rights

KW - Human rights

KW - academic freedom

KW - policy

M3 - Safe Gwe / Cyhoeddiad Gwe

PB - Internationales Österreichisches Archäologie Forum

ER -

Die Anwendungsgrenzen des § 11 Abs. 1 DMSG

Crynodeb

Mynediad at Ddogfen

Ôl bys

Allbwn Ymchwil

Rechtswidrige Denkmalpflege: Eine (nicht nur österreichische) Realsatire über archäologische NFG-Pflichten; deren gesetzliche Grenzen; und die staatliche Denkmalpflege

Ein Vorschlag für neue archäologische Denkmalschutzbestimmungen für Österreich.

Führerschein oder Einzelfahrerlaubnis? Ein Vergleich von Genehmigungspflichten für Straßenverkehr und Nachforschungen

Dyfynnu hyn