High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity steady-state training in UK cardiac rehabilitation programmes (HIIT or MISS UK): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation

Gordon McGregor, Simon Nichols, Thomas Hamborg, Lucy Bryning, Rhiannon Edwards, David Markland, Jenny Mercer, Stefan Birkett, Stewart Ennis, Richard Powell, Brian Begg, Mark Haykowsky, Prithwish Banerjee, Lee Ingle, Rob Shave, Karianne Backx

    Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

    300 Wedi eu Llwytho i Lawr (Pure)

    Crynodeb

    Current international guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation (CR) advocate moderate-intensity exercise training (MISS, moderate-intensity steady state). This recommendation predates significant advances in medical therapy for coronary heart disease (CHD) and may not be the most appropriate strategy for the ‘modern’ patient with CHD. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) appears to be a safe and effective alternative, resulting in greater improvements in peak oxygen uptake (VO2 peak). To date, HIIT trials have predominantly been proof-of-concept studies in the laboratory setting and conducted outside the UK. The purpose of this multicentre randomised controlled trial is to compare the effects of HIIT and MISS training in patients with CHD attending UK CR programmes.
    Iaith wreiddiolSaesneg
    Rhif yr erthygl6:e012843
    Tudalennau (o-i)1-9
    Nifer y tudalennau9
    CyfnodolynBMJ Open
    Cyfrol6
    Rhif cyhoeddi11
    Dynodwyr Gwrthrych Digidol (DOIs)
    StatwsCyhoeddwyd - 18 Tach 2016

    Ôl bys

    Gweld gwybodaeth am bynciau ymchwil 'High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity steady-state training in UK cardiac rehabilitation programmes (HIIT or MISS UK): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation'. Gyda’i gilydd, maen nhw’n ffurfio ôl bys unigryw.

    Dyfynnu hyn