TY - JOUR
T1 - Shedding the mitochondrial blinkers: A long-overdue challenge for species delimitation in herpetology
AU - Wüster, Wolfgang
PY - 2025/8/21
Y1 - 2025/8/21
N2 - The advent of molecular methods has revolutionised the field of species delimitation and description, one of the key tasks of system- atic biology. In animal taxonomy, one marker, the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) molecule, has acquired and retained disproportion- ate influence. This is despite its uniparental, clonal mode of inheritance, as a result of which the entire molecule acts as a single locus, and that precludes its use as a test for admixture between putative lineages, a key consideration in species delimitation. To establish the extent to which the limitations of mtDNA affect present-day taxonomy in non-avian reptiles, I surveyed species descriptions and delimitations published during the years 2023–2024, determined the markers used, and whether analyses of different markers were set up to critically test or just to confirm mtDNA-inspired candidate species. Mitochondrial DNA remains the dominant molecular marker in reptile taxonomy, being used in 84% of species descriptions and delimitations, and as the sole molecular marker in 44%. Despite the immense progress in next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies and their increasing affordability, only 3.4% of descriptions used NGS approaches. In 61% of descriptions, taxa were identified primarily through mtDNA divergence, and addi- tional data (morphology, single-copy nuclear gene sequences) were used as confirmatory evidence rather than as rigorous tests of mitochondrially inferred species limits. I reiterate the importance of truly integrative species delimitation that critically tests species limits first hypothesised from mtDNA, and suggest ways of improving the robustness of species delimitations by optimising the allo- cation of resources to more appropriate markers and through analytical approaches that critically test the evolutionary independence of putative species.
AB - The advent of molecular methods has revolutionised the field of species delimitation and description, one of the key tasks of system- atic biology. In animal taxonomy, one marker, the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) molecule, has acquired and retained disproportion- ate influence. This is despite its uniparental, clonal mode of inheritance, as a result of which the entire molecule acts as a single locus, and that precludes its use as a test for admixture between putative lineages, a key consideration in species delimitation. To establish the extent to which the limitations of mtDNA affect present-day taxonomy in non-avian reptiles, I surveyed species descriptions and delimitations published during the years 2023–2024, determined the markers used, and whether analyses of different markers were set up to critically test or just to confirm mtDNA-inspired candidate species. Mitochondrial DNA remains the dominant molecular marker in reptile taxonomy, being used in 84% of species descriptions and delimitations, and as the sole molecular marker in 44%. Despite the immense progress in next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies and their increasing affordability, only 3.4% of descriptions used NGS approaches. In 61% of descriptions, taxa were identified primarily through mtDNA divergence, and addi- tional data (morphology, single-copy nuclear gene sequences) were used as confirmatory evidence rather than as rigorous tests of mitochondrially inferred species limits. I reiterate the importance of truly integrative species delimitation that critically tests species limits first hypothesised from mtDNA, and suggest ways of improving the robustness of species delimitations by optimising the allo- cation of resources to more appropriate markers and through analytical approaches that critically test the evolutionary independence of putative species.
KW - Herpetology
KW - integrative taxonomy
KW - mitochondrial DNA
KW - morphometrics
KW - multilocus analyses
KW - Reptilia
KW - species delimitation
KW - taxonomy
U2 - 10.3897/vz.75.e161536
DO - 10.3897/vz.75.e161536
M3 - Article
SN - 2625-8498
VL - 75
SP - 259
EP - 275
JO - Vertebrate Zoology
JF - Vertebrate Zoology
ER -