The Sorry Tale of British Journalism and our Right to Privacy

Vian Bakir; Andrew McStay

The Sorry Tale of British Journalism and our Right to Privacy

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad arall › Cyfraniad Arall

Crynodeb

1.1 Focusing on privacy, we address the inquiry’s questions on cultural factors in ensuring that human rights are respected.
1.2 We show how British journalism does a poor job in promoting the right to privacy, especially given its demonstrable preference for a counter-narrative promoted by the intelligence elite on the importance of surveillance for national security. To explain this, we draw on published academic work on the 2013 leaks by National Security Agency (NSA) whistleblower, Edward Snowden, on mass surveillance.
1.3 We recommend that:
- Journalists should be encouraged to reject a simplistic binary narrative of surveillance
versus privacy: there are many shades of complexity within these issues.
- Journalists should not automatically privilege intelligence elite sources (especially
intelligence agencies and their political mouthpieces) but should give more prominence to those pointing out the human rights implications of security practices.

Iaith wreiddiol	Saesneg
Cyfrwng allbwn	online
Cyhoeddwr	UK Parliament
Nifer y tudalennau	9
Man cyhoeddi	London
Statws	Cyhoeddwyd - 22 Maw 2018

Cyfres gyhoeddiadau

Enw	House of Lords JCHR Inquiry on Human Rights: Attitudes to Enforcement

Mynediad at Ddogfen

http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/human-rights-committee/human-rights-attitudes-to-enforcement/written/80564.htmlTrwydded: !!Unspecified

Dyfynnu hyn

@misc{f2b2772ec4ba473392e39dd422719579,

title = "The Sorry Tale of British Journalism and our Right to Privacy",

abstract = "1.1 Focusing on privacy, we address the inquiry{\textquoteright}s questions on cultural factors in ensuring that human rights are respected. 1.2 We show how British journalism does a poor job in promoting the right to privacy, especially given its demonstrable preference for a counter-narrative promoted by the intelligence elite on the importance of surveillance for national security. To explain this, we draw on published academic work on the 2013 leaks by National Security Agency (NSA) whistleblower, Edward Snowden, on mass surveillance. 1.3 We recommend that: - Journalists should be encouraged to reject a simplistic binary narrative of surveillance versus privacy: there are many shades of complexity within these issues. - Journalists should not automatically privilege intelligence elite sources (especially intelligence agencies and their political mouthpieces) but should give more prominence to those pointing out the human rights implications of security practices.",

keywords = "judiciary, surveillance, journalism, privacy, human rights",

author = "Vian Bakir and Andrew McStay",

note = "Scope of the inquiry The United Kingdom has a proud tradition of respect for human rights. Those rights are supported by political parties, and such rights have long been an integral part of common law, as well as being enshrined in statute by the Human Rights Act 1998. However much rights may be recognised and protected within the legal framework, there can be barriers to achieving a culture which understands and respects human rights and practical barriers to those who wish to enforce their legal rights. In this wide-ranging inquiry, the Joint Committee on Human Rights is calling for evidence on factors which may impede individuals from using the UK{\textquoteright}s human rights framework effectively. ",

year = "2018",

month = mar,

day = "22",

language = "English",

series = "House of Lords JCHR Inquiry on Human Rights: Attitudes to Enforcement",

publisher = "UK Parliament",

type = "Other",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - The Sorry Tale of British Journalism and our Right to Privacy

AU - Bakir, Vian

AU - McStay, Andrew

N1 - Scope of the inquiry The United Kingdom has a proud tradition of respect for human rights. Those rights are supported by political parties, and such rights have long been an integral part of common law, as well as being enshrined in statute by the Human Rights Act 1998. However much rights may be recognised and protected within the legal framework, there can be barriers to achieving a culture which understands and respects human rights and practical barriers to those who wish to enforce their legal rights. In this wide-ranging inquiry, the Joint Committee on Human Rights is calling for evidence on factors which may impede individuals from using the UK’s human rights framework effectively.

PY - 2018/3/22

Y1 - 2018/3/22

N2 - 1.1 Focusing on privacy, we address the inquiry’s questions on cultural factors in ensuring that human rights are respected. 1.2 We show how British journalism does a poor job in promoting the right to privacy, especially given its demonstrable preference for a counter-narrative promoted by the intelligence elite on the importance of surveillance for national security. To explain this, we draw on published academic work on the 2013 leaks by National Security Agency (NSA) whistleblower, Edward Snowden, on mass surveillance. 1.3 We recommend that: - Journalists should be encouraged to reject a simplistic binary narrative of surveillance versus privacy: there are many shades of complexity within these issues. - Journalists should not automatically privilege intelligence elite sources (especially intelligence agencies and their political mouthpieces) but should give more prominence to those pointing out the human rights implications of security practices.

AB - 1.1 Focusing on privacy, we address the inquiry’s questions on cultural factors in ensuring that human rights are respected. 1.2 We show how British journalism does a poor job in promoting the right to privacy, especially given its demonstrable preference for a counter-narrative promoted by the intelligence elite on the importance of surveillance for national security. To explain this, we draw on published academic work on the 2013 leaks by National Security Agency (NSA) whistleblower, Edward Snowden, on mass surveillance. 1.3 We recommend that: - Journalists should be encouraged to reject a simplistic binary narrative of surveillance versus privacy: there are many shades of complexity within these issues. - Journalists should not automatically privilege intelligence elite sources (especially intelligence agencies and their political mouthpieces) but should give more prominence to those pointing out the human rights implications of security practices.

KW - judiciary

KW - surveillance

KW - journalism

KW - privacy

KW - human rights

M3 - Other contribution

T3 - House of Lords JCHR Inquiry on Human Rights: Attitudes to Enforcement

PB - UK Parliament

CY - London

ER -

The Sorry Tale of British Journalism and our Right to Privacy

Crynodeb

Cyfres gyhoeddiadau

Mynediad at Ddogfen

Ôl bys

Dyfynnu hyn