Neidio i’r brif dudalen lywio Neidio i chwilio Neidio i’r prif gynnwys

Weak effects of geolocators on small birds: a meta-analysis controlled for phylogeny and publication bias

  • Vojtěch Brlík
  • , Jaroslav Koleček
  • , Malcolm Burgess
  • , Steffen Hahn
  • , Diana Humple
  • , Miloš Krist
  • , Janne Ouwehand
  • , Emily Weiser
  • , Peter Adamík
  • , José Alves
  • , Debora Arlt
  • , Sanja Barišić
  • , Detlef Becker
  • , Eduardo Belda
  • , Václav Beran
  • , Christiaan Both
  • , Susana Bravo
  • , Martins Briedis
  • , Bohumír Chutný
  • , Davor Ćiković
  • Nathan Cooper, Joana Costa, Víctor Cueto, Tamara Emmenegger, Kevin Fraser, Olivier Gilg, Marina Guerrero, Michael Hallworth, Chris Hewson, James Johnson, Frédéric Jiguet, Tosha Kelly, Dmitry Kishkinev, Michel Leconte, Terje Lislevand, Simeon Lisovski, Cosme López, Kent McFarland, Peter Marra, Steven Matsuoka, Piotr Matyjasiak, Christoph Meier, Benjamin Metzger, Juan Monrós, Roland Neumann, Amy Newman, Ryan Norris, Tomas Pärt, Václav Pavel, Noah Perlut, Markus Piha, Jeroen Reneerkens, Christopher Rimmer, Amélie Roberto-Charron, Chiara Scandolara, Natasha Sokolova, Makiko Takenaka, Dirk Tolkmitt, Herman van Oosten, Arndt Wellbrock, Hazel Wheeler, Jan van der Winden, Klaudia Witte, Brad Woodworth, Petr Procházka
  • Institute of Vertebrate Biology, The Czech Academy of Sciences
  • Charles University Prague
  • RSPB
  • Swiss Ornithological Institute
  • Point Blue Conservation Science
  • US Geological Survey
  • University of Aveiro
  • University of Iceland
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
  • Institute of Ornithology, Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts
  • Museum Heineanum
  • Universitat Politècnica de València
  • Municipal Museum of Ústí nad Labem
  • ALKA Wildlife, o.p.s
  • CIEMEP, CONICET/UNPSJB
  • Migratory Bird Center, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute
  • University of Manitoba, Winnipeg
  • Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté
  • Groupe de recherche en Ecologie Arctique
  • Servicio de Jardines, Bosques y Huertas, Patronato de la Alhambra y el Generalife
  • British Trust for Ornithology
  • MNHN-CNRS-Sorbonne Université
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
  • Vermont Center for Ecostudies
  • USGS Alaska Science Center
  • Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University, Warsaw
  • University of Guelph, Ontario
  • University of South Bohemia
  • Russian Academy of Sciences
  • Arctic Research Center of Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District
  • Tokai University Sapporo Campus
  • Oenanthe Ecologie
  • University of Siegen
  • Wildlife Preservation Canada
  • Ecology Research & Consultancy
  • University of Groningen
  • University of Queensland
  • University of Western Ontario, Canada
  • University of Bergen
  • University of Sevilla
  • University of Helsinki
  • Palacký University
  • University of Valencia
  • Kansas State University
  • University of New England, Maine
  • Radboud University Nijmegen

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

230 Wedi eu Llwytho i Lawr (Pure)

Crynodeb

1. Currently, the deployment of tracking devices is one of the most frequently used approaches to study movement ecology of birds. Recent miniaturisation of light-level geolocators enabled studying small bird species whose migratory patterns were widely unknown. However, geolocators may reduce vital rates in tagged birds and may bias obtained movement data. 2. There is a need for a thorough assessment of the potential tag effects on small birds, as previous meta-analyses did not evaluate unpublished data and impact of multiple life-history traits, focused mainly on large species and the number of published studies tagging small birds has increased substantially. 3. We quantitatively reviewed 549 records extracted from 74 published and 48 unpublished studies on over 7,800 tagged and 17,800 control individuals to examine the effects of geolocator tagging on small bird species (body mass <100 g). We calculated the effect of tagging on apparent survival, condition, phenology and breeding performance and identified the most important predictors of the magnitude of effect sizes. 4. Even though the effects were not statistically significant in phylogenetically controlled models, we found a weak negative impact of geolocators on apparent survival. The negative effect on apparent survival was stronger with increasing relative load of the device and with geolocators attached using elastic harnesses. Moreover, tagging effects were stronger in smaller species. 5. In conclusion, we found a weak effect on apparent survival of tagged birds and managed to pinpoint key aspects and drivers of tagging effects. We provide recommendations for establishing matched control group for proper effect size assessment in future studies and outline various aspects of tagging that need further investigation. Finally, our results encourage further use of geolocators on small bird species but the ethical aspects and scientific benefits should always be considered.
Iaith wreiddiolSaesneg
Tudalennau (o-i)207-220
CyfnodolynJournal of Animal Ecology
Cyfrol89
Rhif cyhoeddi1
Dyddiad ar-lein cynnar16 Chwef 2019
Dynodwyr Gwrthrych Digidol (DOIs)
StatwsCyhoeddwyd - Ion 2020

Ôl bys

Gweld gwybodaeth am bynciau ymchwil 'Weak effects of geolocators on small birds: a meta-analysis controlled for phylogeny and publication bias'. Gyda’i gilydd, maen nhw’n ffurfio ôl bys unigryw.

Dyfynnu hyn