A methodological systematic review of what’s wrong with meta-ethnography reporting

  • E.F. France
  • , N. Ring
  • , R. Thomas
  • , J. Noyes
  • , M. Maxwell
  • , R. Jepson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Syntheses of qualitative studies can inform health policy, services and our understanding of patient experience. Meta-ethnography is a systematic seven-phase interpretive qualitative synthesis approach well-suited to producing new theories and conceptual models. However, there are concerns about the quality of meta-ethnography reporting, particularly the analysis and synthesis processes. Our aim was to investigate the application and reporting of methods in recent meta-ethnography journal papers, focusing on the analysis and synthesis process and output.
    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages16
    JournalBMC Medical Research Methodology
    Volume14
    Issue number119
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 19 Nov 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A methodological systematic review of what’s wrong with meta-ethnography reporting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this