A Systematic Review of Literature on Effectiveness of Training in Emergency Risk Communication

Ann Neville Miller, Timothy Sellnow, Lindsay Neuberger, Andrew Todd, Rebecca Freihaut, Jane Noyes, Tomas Allen, Nyka Alexander, Marsha Vanderford, Gaya Gamhewage

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    814 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Although disaster preparedness training is regularly conducted for a range of health-related professions, little evidence-based guidance is available about how best to actually develop capacity in staff for conducting emergency risk communication. This article presents results of a systematic review undertaken to inform the development of World Health Organization guidelines for risk communication during public health and humanitarian emergencies. A total of 6,720 articles were screened, with 24 articles identified for final analysis. The majority of research studies identified were conducted in the United States, were either disaster general or focused on infectious disease outbreak, involved in-service training, and used uncontrolled quantitative or mixed method research designs. Synthesized findings suggest that risk communication training should include a focus on collaboration across agencies, training in working with media, and emphasis on designing messages for specific audience needs. However, certainty of findings was at best moderate due to lack of methodological rigor in most studies.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)612-629
    Number of pages19
    JournalJournal of Health Communication
    Volume22
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 6 Jul 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A Systematic Review of Literature on Effectiveness of Training in Emergency Risk Communication'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this