A systematic review of the Goldberg-Huxley model of the pathway to psychiatric care.

Peter Huxley; Alicja Gromadzka; Sadia Nafees; Anne Krayer; Daniel Lai Jie

A systematic review of the Goldberg-Huxley model of the pathway to psychiatric care.

Peter Huxley
, Alicja Gromadzka
, Sadia Nafees
, Anne Krayer
, Daniel Lai Jie

School of Health Sciences

School of Human and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University

Research output: Other contribution › peer-review

150 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The questions to be addressed by the review are, since the last update of the Goldberg-Huxley model:
(1) Does epidemiological research still support the rates of disorder found at level 1 of the model?
(2) Does epidemiological research still support the consultation rates at level 2?
(3) What is the evidence about the permeability of the first filter to people with FEP (first episode psychosis)?

Original language	English
Type	Systematic Review Protocol
Media of output	Online report
Publisher	NIHR PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews)
Number of pages	4
Place of Publication	online
Edition	CRD42021270603
Volume	CRD42021270603
Publication status	Published - 2 Aug 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

systematic review protocol
mental health service delivery
Goldberg-Huxley model

Access to Document

CRD42021270603 Huxley et al 2021 ProtocolFinal published version, 93.1 KBLicence: Unspecified

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021270603Licence: Unspecified
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=270603Licence: Unspecified

The Goldberg-Huxley model of the pathway to psychiatric care: 21st-century systematic review
Huxley, P., Krayer, A., Poole, R., Gromadzka, A., Lai Jie, D. & Nafees, S., Jul 2023, In: BJPsych open. 9, 4, 8 p., e114.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Open Access
File
207 Downloads (Pure)

Cite this

@misc{2dec1729f8314d5fbfd256d3d0a37269,

title = "A systematic review of the Goldberg-Huxley model of the pathway to psychiatric care.",

abstract = "The questions to be addressed by the review are, since the last update of the Goldberg-Huxley model: (1) Does epidemiological research still support the rates of disorder found at level 1 of the model? (2) Does epidemiological research still support the consultation rates at level 2? (3) What is the evidence about the permeability of the first filter to people with FEP (first episode psychosis)?",

keywords = "systematic review protocol, mental health service delivery, Goldberg-Huxley model",

author = "Peter Huxley and Alicja Gromadzka and Sadia Nafees and Anne Krayer and \{Lai Jie\}, Daniel",

note = "Peter Huxley, Alicja Gromadzka, Sadia Nafees, Anne Krayer, Daniel Lai Jie. A systematic review of the Goldberg-Huxley model of the pathway to psychiatric care. PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021270603 Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display\_record.php?ID=CRD42021270603",

year = "2021",

month = aug,

day = "2",

language = "English",

volume = "CRD42021270603",

publisher = "NIHR PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews)",

edition = "CRD42021270603",

type = "Other",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - A systematic review of the Goldberg-Huxley model of the pathway to psychiatric care.

AU - Huxley, Peter

AU - Gromadzka, Alicja

AU - Nafees, Sadia

AU - Krayer, Anne

AU - Lai Jie, Daniel

N1 - Peter Huxley, Alicja Gromadzka, Sadia Nafees, Anne Krayer, Daniel Lai Jie. A systematic review of the Goldberg-Huxley model of the pathway to psychiatric care. PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021270603 Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021270603

PY - 2021/8/2

Y1 - 2021/8/2

N2 - The questions to be addressed by the review are, since the last update of the Goldberg-Huxley model: (1) Does epidemiological research still support the rates of disorder found at level 1 of the model? (2) Does epidemiological research still support the consultation rates at level 2? (3) What is the evidence about the permeability of the first filter to people with FEP (first episode psychosis)?

AB - The questions to be addressed by the review are, since the last update of the Goldberg-Huxley model: (1) Does epidemiological research still support the rates of disorder found at level 1 of the model? (2) Does epidemiological research still support the consultation rates at level 2? (3) What is the evidence about the permeability of the first filter to people with FEP (first episode psychosis)?

KW - systematic review protocol

KW - mental health service delivery

KW - Goldberg-Huxley model

M3 - Other contribution

VL - CRD42021270603

PB - NIHR PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews)

CY - online

ER -

A systematic review of the Goldberg-Huxley model of the pathway to psychiatric care.

Abstract

UN SDGs

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Research output

The Goldberg-Huxley model of the pathway to psychiatric care: 21st-century systematic review

Cite this