Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

An action to an object does not improve its episodic encoding; but removes distraction

    Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting Abstractpeer-review

    Abstract

    There is some debate as to whether responding to objects in our environment improves episodic memory or not. Some authors claim that actively encoding objects improves their representation in episodic memory. Conversely, episodic memory has also been shown to improve in passive conditions, suggesting that the action itself could interfere with the encoding process. This study looks at the impact of attention and action on episodic memory using a novel WWW task that includes information about object identity (What), spatial (Where) and temporal (When) properties. With this approach we studied the episodic memory of two types of object: Target, where attention or an action is defined, and Distractor, object to be ignored, following two selective states: active vs. passive selection. When targets were actively selected, we found no evidence of episodic memory enhancement; but instead memory from irrelevant sources was
    suppressed. The pattern was replicated across a 2D static display and a more realistic 3D virtual environment. This selective attention effect on episodic memory was not observed on non-episodic measures, demonstrating a link between attention and the encoding of episodic experiences.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)244-244
    Number of pages1
    JournalPerception
    Volume44
    Issue number1-Supp
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2015

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'An action to an object does not improve its episodic encoding; but removes distraction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this