Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Are Covered Bonds a Substitute for Mortgage-Backed Securities?

  • Santiago Carbo-Valverde
  • , Francisco Rodriguez Fernandez
  • , Richard Rosen
  • Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
  • University of Granada

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

342 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Given the problems in the mortgage-backed securities (MBS) market during the financial crisis, some suggest that covered bonds (CB) might be a substitute for MBS. This could lead to a number of policy alternatives in countries where regulation and business have been mainly leaning to one of these types of securities. Examining the use of CB and MBS in the U.S. and Europe, we find that the two often seem to be used for different purposes. Banks are more likely to use CB when they have liquidity needs while MBS are associated with risk management and agency problems. Introducing MBS to markets where only CB are common or CB to markets where only MBS are common could have large effects.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)238-253
JournalJournal of Economic Policy Reform
Volume20
Issue number3
Early online date28 Mar 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are Covered Bonds a Substitute for Mortgage-Backed Securities?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this