Are policies for decentralised forest governance designed to achieve full devolution? Evidence from Eastern Africa

Social Sciences

• Forest Management 100%
• Africa 100%
• Forest Resources 50%
• Kenya 50%
• Small Groups 50%
• Management Approach 50%
• Comparative Study 50%
• Uganda 50%
• Ethiopia 50%
• Community Participation 50%
• Privatization 50%
• Common Pool Resources 50%
• Marginalized Group 50%

Keyphrases

• Devolution 100%
• Eastern Africa 100%
• Decentralized Forest Management 100%
• Forest Policy 33%
• Kenya 16%
• Privatization 16%
• Ethiopia 16%
• Forest Reserve 16%
• Community Engagement 16%
• Local Actors 16%
• Group of People 16%
• Forest Management 16%
• Decentralization 16%
• Elite Capture 16%
• Uganda 16%
• Marginalized Groups 16%
• Ugandan 16%
• De-facto 16%
• Kenyan 16%
• Common Pool Resources 16%
• Decentralization Policy 16%
• Multiple Countries 16%
• Equitable Benefit Sharing 16%
• Rio Declaration 16%
• Forest Management Approaches 16%
• Ethiopian 16%
• Tanzanian 16%

Earth and Planetary Sciences

• Eastern Africa 100%
• Forest Management 100%
• Forest Policy 100%
• Kenya 50%
• Ethiopia 50%
• Uganda 50%
• Forest Reserve 50%
• Comparative Study 50%