Are review articles a reliable source of evidence to support conservation and environmental management? A comparison with medicine.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Keywords

@article{0f9d1b85673e4ff699a3ab8fd7b2e65e,

title = "Are review articles a reliable source of evidence to support conservation and environmental management? A comparison with medicine.",

keywords = "BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION, ECOLOGY, ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES",

author = "P.D. Roberts and G.B. Stewart and A.S. Pullin",

year = "2006",

month = oct,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.biocon.2006.04.034",

language = "English",

volume = "132",

pages = "409--423",

journal = "Biological Conservation",

issn = "0006-3207",

publisher = "Elsevier BV",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are review articles a reliable source of evidence to support conservation and environmental management? A comparison with medicine.

AU - Roberts, P.D.

AU - Stewart, G.B.

AU - Pullin, A.S.

PY - 2006/10/1

Y1 - 2006/10/1

KW - BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION

KW - ECOLOGY

KW - ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.04.034

DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.04.034

M3 - Article

SN - 0006-3207

VL - 132

SP - 409

EP - 423

JO - Biological Conservation

JF - Biological Conservation

IS - 4

ER -