Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Border Security Fencing and Wildlife: The End of the Transboundary Paradigm in Eurasia?

  • John D.C. Linell
  • , Arie Trouwborst
  • , Luigi Botani
  • , Prtra Kaczensky
  • , Djuro Harber
  • , Slaven Reljic
  • , Josip Kusak
  • , Aleksandra Majic
  • , Tomaz Skrbinsek
  • , Hubert Potocnik
  • , Matthew Hayward
  • , E.J. Milner-Gulland
  • , Bayarbaatar Buuveibaatar
  • , Kirk A. Olson
  • , Lkhagvasuren Badamjav
  • , Richard Bischof
  • , Steffen Zuther
  • , Urs Breitenmoser
    • Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Trondheim
    • Tilburg University
    • University of Rome
    • University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna
    • University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
    • Biodiversity Institute Oxford
    • Wildlife Conservation Society, Ulaanbaatar
    • Norwegian University of Life Sciences
    • Association for the Conservation of Biodiversity of Kazakhstan, Astana
    • KORA, Muri bei Bern
    • University of Zagreb

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    293 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The ongoing refugee crisis in Europe has seen many countries rush to construct border security fencing to divert or control the flow of people. This follows a trend of border fence construction across Eurasia during the post-9/11 era. This development has gone largely unnoticed by conservation biologists during an era in which, ironically, transboundary cooperation has emerged as a conservation paradigm. These fences represent a major threat to wildlife because they can cause mortality, obstruct access to seasonally important resources, and reduce effective population size. We summarise the extent of the issue and propose concrete mitigation measures.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere1002483
    JournalPLoS Biology
    Volume14
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 22 Jun 2016

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
      SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Border Security Fencing and Wildlife: The End of the Transboundary Paradigm in Eurasia?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this