Abstract
Securitization enhances liquidity of debt contracts. However, its structural deficiency at origination has led to the freezing of its secondary market and failure of institutions holding the collateral. This paper builds on key cultural (i.e., Islamic) rulings to rectify flaws entrenched in securitized debt stemming from asymmetric information and agency issues. These injunctions help in the efficient underwriting of debt contracts across the globe to: (i) redeem its „toxicity‟; (ii) guarantee liquidity; (iii) alleviate fragility of the financial system; and (iv) promote economic growth. Finally, this study promotes a rethink of the current „Islamic‟ financial system from a narrow literalist juridical perspective to one that is grounded in financial economics
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 271-286 |
| Journal | Journal of Corporate Finance |
| Volume | 37 |
| Early online date | 9 Jan 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2016 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Can Islamic Injunctions Indemnify the Structural Flaws of Securitized Debt?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver