Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Carbon exchange in an Amazon forest: from hours to years

  • Matthew N. Hayek
  • , Marcos Longo
  • , Jin Wu
  • , Marielle Smith
  • , Natalia Restrepo-Coupe
  • , Raphael Tapajos
  • , Rodrigo da Silva
  • , David R. Fitzjarrald
  • , Plinio B. Camargo
  • , Lucy R. Hutyra
  • , Luciana F. Alves
  • , Bruce Daube
  • , J. William Munger
  • , Kenia T. Wiedemann
  • , Scott R. Saleska
  • Harvard Law School
  • The California Institute of Technology
  • Michigan State University
  • University of Technology, Sydney
  • Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará
  • University at Albany, USA
  • Universidade de São Paulo
  • Boston University
  • University of California, Los Angeles
  • Harvard University
  • University of Arizona, Tucson
  • Brookhaven National Laboratory

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In Amazon forests, the relative contributions of climate, phenology, and disturbance to net ecosystem exchange of carbon (NEE) are not well understood. To partition influences across various timescales, we use a statistical model to represent eddy-covariance-derived NEE in an evergreen eastern Amazon forest as a constant response to changing meteorology and phenology throughout a decade. Our best fit model represented hourly NEE variations as changes due to sunlight, while seasonal variations arose from phenology influencing photosynthesis and from rainfall influencing ecosystem respiration, where phenology was asynchronous with dry-season onset. We compared annual model residuals with biometric forest surveys to estimate impacts of drought disturbance. We found that our simple model represented hourly and monthly variations in NEE well (R2=0.81 and 0.59, respectively). Modeled phenology explained 1 % of hourly and 26 % of monthly variations in observed NEE, whereas the remaining modeled variability was due to changes in meteorology. We did not find evidence to support the common assumption that the forest phenology was seasonally light- or water-triggered. Our model simulated annual NEE well, with the exception of 2002, the first year of our data record, which contained 1.2 MgC ha−1 of residual net emissions, because photosynthesis was anomalously low. Because a severe drought occurred in 1998, we hypothesized that this drought caused a persistent, multi-year depression of photosynthesis. Our results suggest drought can have lasting impacts on photosynthesis, possibly via partial damage to still-living trees.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4833–4848
JournalBiogeosciences
Volume15
Issue number15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Aug 2018
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Carbon exchange in an Amazon forest: from hours to years'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this