Case Comment: Martin v Kogan

Mark Hyland; Michael Howard

Case Comment: Martin v Kogan

Mark Hyland
, Michael Howard

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

485 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Comments on Martin v Kogan (IPEC), setting out the applicable tests for joint authorship, and accordingly, whether the defendant's contribution rendered her joint author of the claimant's screenplay. Considers the case's contribution to determining what is "substantial" for the purposes of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 s.10(1) and its consequences for the creative industries and practitioners in the field.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	817-820
Journal	European Intellectual Property Review
Volume	40
Issue number	12
Publication status	Published - Dec 2018

Keywords

Joint Authorship
Test for Control
Copyright

Access to Document

2018 Martin v KoganAccepted author manuscript, 433 KBLicence: CC BY-NC

Cite this

@article{d951c582d680447f80c4f13900c641de,

title = "Case Comment: Martin v Kogan",

abstract = "Comments on Martin v Kogan (IPEC), setting out the applicable tests for joint authorship, and accordingly, whether the defendant's contribution rendered her joint author of the claimant's screenplay. Considers the case's contribution to determining what is {"}substantial{"} for the purposes of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 s.10(1) and its consequences for the creative industries and practitioners in the field.",

keywords = "Joint Authorship, Test for Control, Copyright",

author = "Mark Hyland and Michael Howard",

year = "2018",

month = dec,

language = "English",

volume = "40",

pages = "817--820",

journal = "European Intellectual Property Review",

issn = "0142-0461",

publisher = "Sweet and Maxwell",

number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Case Comment: Martin v Kogan

AU - Hyland, Mark

AU - Howard, Michael

PY - 2018/12

Y1 - 2018/12

N2 - Comments on Martin v Kogan (IPEC), setting out the applicable tests for joint authorship, and accordingly, whether the defendant's contribution rendered her joint author of the claimant's screenplay. Considers the case's contribution to determining what is "substantial" for the purposes of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 s.10(1) and its consequences for the creative industries and practitioners in the field.

AB - Comments on Martin v Kogan (IPEC), setting out the applicable tests for joint authorship, and accordingly, whether the defendant's contribution rendered her joint author of the claimant's screenplay. Considers the case's contribution to determining what is "substantial" for the purposes of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 s.10(1) and its consequences for the creative industries and practitioners in the field.

KW - Joint Authorship

KW - Test for Control

KW - Copyright

M3 - Article

SN - 0142-0461

VL - 40

SP - 817

EP - 820

JO - European Intellectual Property Review

JF - European Intellectual Property Review

IS - 12

ER -

Case Comment: Martin v Kogan

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this