Centralised or Decentralised Banking Supervision? Evidence from European Banks  

Giuseppe Avignone, Yener Altunbas, Salvatore Polizzi, Alessio Reghezza

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

376 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper analyses the impact of the Banking Union on European bank credit risk. Specifically, we investigate the effect that the establishment of the Single Supervisory Mechanism has had on the credit risk of the banks it supervises in comparison to financial institutions that are still supervised by National Supervisory Authorities. We analyse a sample of 746 European banks over the period 2011-2018, by means of a difference-in-differences methodology. We provide empirical evidence that Single Supervisory Mechanism supervised banks reduced credit risk exposure compared to banks supervised by National Supervisory Authorities, suggesting that the Banking Union has successfully reduced the riskiness of the European banking sector. Our results passed a battery of robustness tests that support the reliability of our analysis. Our contribution sheds light on the benefits of centralised versus decentralised supervision, on the effectiveness of the current supervisory system in Europe, and on its impact on European bank risk.
Original languageEnglish
Article number102264
JournalJournal of International Money and Finance
Volume110
Early online date20 Aug 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Centralised or Decentralised Banking Supervision? Evidence from European Banks  '. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this