CHOSEN: A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial

  • Craig J Smith
  • , Andrew Brand
  • , Zoe Hoare
  • , Eileen Jones
  • , Catherine Davidson
  • , Wendy Westoby
  • , Ian Clements
  • , Fiona Sandom
  • , Clare Gross
  • , Anu Thomas
  • , Lucy Talbot
  • , Narayanamoorthi Saravanan
  • , Marian C Brady
  • , Peter Langhorne
  • , Giles I McCracken
  • , Catherine E Lightbody
  • , Caroline L Watkins
  • , Paul R Brocklehurst

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Improving oral health in patients with acutely dysphagic stroke is a plausible approach to prevent pneumonia. We aimed to determine whether a phase 3, definitive trial of oral health care (OHC) treatments, supported by staff education and training, is feasible in stroke unit care. The CHOSEN (Chlorhexidine or Toothpaste, Manual or Powered Brushing to prevent Pneumonia Complicating Stroke) trial was conducted and reported in line with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials 2010 statement extended to feasibility trials. We aimed to recruit 120 participants with acute stroke and dysphagia within 24 hours of admission, from 4 stroke units in the northwest of England, randomized (1:1:1:1) to 1 of 4 OHC treatments: manual toothbrush or powered toothbrush with either nonfoaming toothpaste or chlorhexidine 1% gel. Stroke unit nursing staff received standardized education and training. Feasibility was assessed using a priori criteria. Between January 2022 and end of January 2023, 626 patients were screened. A total of 101 participants (median age, 73 [interquartile range, 62-80] years; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 10 [interquartile range, 5-18]; 44% women) were enrolled (77% of eligible patients approached). Adherence was 91%, with no substantial difference between the OHC treatments, and 88% completed follow-up. There were 19 serious adverse events but no marked differences between allocated OHC treatments. In exploratory secondary analyses, again there were no substantial differences in survival, incident pneumonia, modified Rankin Scale score, or quality of life at 3 months between the OHC treatment allocations. OHC treatments incorporating chlorhexidine and powered brushing and supported by standardized staff training appeared feasible and safe in patients with acutely dysphagic stroke. Progression criteria were met for a definitive trial of efficacy and cost effectiveness. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN52421361; Unique identifier: ISRCTN52421361.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere040677
JournalJournal of the American Heart Association
Volume14
Issue number18
Early online date11 Sept 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Sept 2025

Keywords

  • Female
  • Deglutition Disorders - therapy - complications - etiology
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • chlorhexidine
  • poststroke pneumonia
  • Aged
  • Oral Hygiene - methods
  • stroke, acute
  • Stroke - complications - therapy - diagnosis
  • oral health care
  • randomized trial
  • Toothbrushing - instrumentation - methods
  • Pneumonia, Aspiration - prevention & control - etiology
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Chlorhexidine - administration & dosage
  • Feasibility Studies
  • England
  • Oral Health
  • Deglutition Disorders/therapy
  • Pneumonia, Aspiration/prevention & control
  • Stroke/complications
  • Chlorhexidine/administration & dosage
  • Toothbrushing/instrumentation
  • Oral Hygiene/methods

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'CHOSEN: A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this