Comparative life cycle assessment of plant and beef-based patties, including carbon opportunity costs

  • Sophie Saget
  • , Marcela Porto Costa
  • , Carla Sancho Santos
  • , Marta Vasconcelos
  • , David Styles
  • , Mike Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

356 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Legume-derived foods have been shown to have comparatively low greenhouse gas (GHG) intensities whilst providing high amounts of nutrients. However, processing legumes into meat analogues can incur significant energy costs. Here, we undertake a comprehensive life cycle assessment of plant-based and (Brazilian and Irish) beef burger patties. Sixteen impact categories are supplemented with the carbon opportunity cost of land occupation, and benchmarked against nutrient density units (NDU) to provide holistic evidence on the potential contribution of plant-based patties to environmentally-sustainable nutritional density. Plant-based patties have a smaller environmental footprint across most categories, including a 77% smaller climate change burden, but incur 8% more energy use compared with Brazilian beef patties. Normalised scores (person equivalents) were significantly larger (p 
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)936-952
Number of pages17
JournalSustainable Production and Consumption
Volume28
Early online date19 Jul 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
  2. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
  3. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Keywords

  • Plant protein
  • Meat analogues
  • Nutrient density unit
  • Diet change
  • Climate change
  • Sustainable food

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative life cycle assessment of plant and beef-based patties, including carbon opportunity costs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this