Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparative sanitation data from high-frequency phone surveys across 3 countries.

  • Spike Lewis
  • , Andrew Bell
  • , Beata Kupiec-Teahan
  • , Ana Casas
  • , José Mendoza Sanchez
  • , Simon Willcock
  • , Fiona Anciano
  • , Dani J. Barrington
  • , Mmeli Dube
  • , Paul Hutchings
  • , Caroline Karani
  • , Arturo Llaxacondor
  • , Hellen López
  • , Anna L. Mdee
  • , Alesia D. Ofori
  • , Joy N. Riungu
  • , Kory C. Russel
  • , Alison H. Parker
  • Cornell University
  • Cranfield University
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
  • University of the Western Cape, South Africa
  • University of Western Australia
  • University of Leeds
  • Meru University of Science and Technology
  • Sanima, Av. Grau 629, Barranco, Lima, Perú
  • University of Oregon, Eugene

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

56 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

With less than half of the world's urban population having safely managed sanitation due to the high cost and difficulty of building sewers and treatment plants, many rely on off-grid options like pit latrines and septic tanks, which are hard to empty and often lead to illegal waste dumping; this research focuses on container-based sanitation (CBS) as an emerging off-grid solution. Off-grid sanitation refers to waste management systems that operate independently of centralized infrastructure and CBS is a service providing toilets that collect human waste in sealable containers, which are regularly emptied and safely disposed of. These data relate to a project investigating CBS in Kenya, Peru, and South Africa, focusing on how different user groups access and utilize sanitation – contrasting CBS with other types. Participants, acting as citizen scientists, collected confidential data through a dedicated smartphone app designed by the authors and external contractors. This project aimed to explore the effective scaling, management, and regulation of off-grid sanitation systems, relevant to academics in urban planning, water and sanitation services, institutional capability, policy and governance, and those addressing inequality and poverty reduction.
The 12-month data collection period offered participants small incentives for weekly engagement, in a micro payment for micro tasks approach. Participants were randomly selected, attended a training workshop, and (where needed) were given a smartphone which they could keep at the end of the project. We conducted weekly smartphone surveys in over 300 households across informal settlements. These surveys aimed to understand human-environment interactions by capturing daily life, wellbeing, income, infrastructural service use, and socioeconomic variables at a weekly resolution, contributing to more informed analyses and decision-making.
The smartphone-based approach offers efficient, cost-effective, and flexible data collection, enabling extensive geographical coverage, broad subject areas, and frequent engagement. The Open Data Kit (ODK) tools were used to support data collection in the resource-constrained environment with limited or intermittent connectivity.
Original languageEnglish
Article number110635
Pages (from-to)110635
Number of pages23
JournalData in Brief
Volume55
Early online date13 Jun 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 1 - No Poverty
    SDG 1 No Poverty
  2. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  3. SDG 6 - Clean Water and Sanitation
    SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
  4. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
  5. SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
    SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities

Keywords

  • Food
  • sanitation
  • Water supply
  • WASH
  • Container-based sanitation
  • Smartphone survey
  • Ecosystem service
  • Wellbeing
  • Off-grid sanitation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative sanitation data from high-frequency phone surveys across 3 countries.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this