Conserving the World’s Megafauna and Biodiversity: The Fierce Urgency of Now

  • W.J. Ripple
  • , Guillaume Chapron
  • , José Vicente López-Bao
  • , Sarah M. Durant
  • , D.W. Macdonald
  • , Peter A. Lindsey
  • , Elizabeth L. Bennett
  • , Robert L. Beschta
  • , Jeremy T. Bruskotter
  • , Ahimsa Campos-Arceiz
  • , Richard T. Corlett
  • , Chris T. Darimont
  • , Amy J. Dickman
  • , Rodolfo Dirzo
  • , Holly T. Dublin
  • , James A. Estes
  • , Kristoffer T. Everatt
  • , Mauro Galetti
  • , Varun R. Goswami
  • , Matthew Hayward
  • Simon Hedges, Michael Hoffmann, Luke T. B. Hunter, Graham I. H. Kerley, Mike Letnic, Taal Levi, Fiona Maisels, John C. Morrison, Michael Paul Nelson, Thomas M. Newsome, Luke Painter, Robert M. Pringle, Christopher J. Sandom, John Terborgh, Adrian Treves, Blaire Van Valkenburgh, John A. Vucetich, Aaron J. Wirsing, Arian D. Wallach, Christopher Wolf, Rosie Woodroffe, Hillary Young, L. Zhang

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    126 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    In their critique of our call to save the world’s terrestrial megafauna (Ripple et al. 2016), Ford et al. argue that we undermine broader efforts to conserve biodiversity. Their main arguments are that (1) megafauna conservation does not conserve other species; (2) megafauna already receives enough attention; (3) megafauna does not play a compelling enough ecological role to justify increased conservation efforts; (4) megafauna conservation is counterproductive by taking too big a share of conservation resources; and (5) megafauna is less imperiled than other species and over-shadows their declines.

    Here we acknowledge that all aspects of biodiversity are important and that efforts to conserve megafauna are unlikely to be enough in isolation to conserve all species. We agree with Ford et al. that stronger and varied conservation approaches are necessary to conserve the earth’s biodiversity. However, we deem it necessary to respond to Ford et al.’s critique by highlighting several important factors for consideration
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)197-200
    JournalBioScience
    Volume67
    Issue number3
    Early online date13 Jan 2017
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2017

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 15 - Life on Land
      SDG 15 Life on Land

    Keywords

    • Carnivora
    • Conservation
    • Megafauna

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Conserving the World’s Megafauna and Biodiversity: The Fierce Urgency of Now'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
    • Saving the World's Terrestrial Megafauna

      Ripple, W. J., Chapron, G., López-Bao, J. V., Durant, S. M., Macdonald, D. W., Lindsey, P. A., Bennett, E. L., Beschta, R. L., Bruskotter, J. T., Campos-Arceiz, A., Corlett, R. T., Darimont, C. T., Dickman, A. J., Dirzo, R., Dublin, H. T., Estes, J. A., Everatt, K. T., Goswami, V. R., Galetti, M. & Hayward, M. & 23 others, Hedges, S., Hoffmann, M., Hunter, L. T. B., Kerley, G. I. H., Letnic, M., Levi, T., Maisels, F., Morrison, J. C., Nelson, M. P., Newsome, T. M., Painter, L., Pringle, R. M., Sandom, C. J., Terborgh, J., Treves, A., Van Valkenburgh, B., Vucetich, J. A., Wirsing, A. J., Wallach, A. D., Wolf, C., Woodroffe, R., Young, H. & Zhang, L., 1 Oct 2016, In: BioScience. 66, 10, p. 807-812

      Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

      Open Access
      File
      234 Downloads (Pure)

    Cite this