Abstract
The extent to which customary international laws of armed conflict protect the environment in non-international armed conflict has received very little critical attention to date when compared to the growing body of scholarship that examines the treaty-based environmental laws of international armed conflict. This article presents the first critical examination of the principles of distinction, proportionality, and the doctrine of military necessity and the extent to which they can be better interpreted to protect the environment during the conduct of hostilities in non-international armed conflict. In so doing, this article fills a key gap in understanding and knowledge and it moves the debate forward by suggesting ways in which the International Law Commission might develop more ambitious draft principles in their current programme of work.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 759-779 |
| Journal | Leiden Journal of International Law |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 13 Sept 2019 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- International Law Commission
- customary international law
- environment
- non-international armed conflict
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Critical perspectives on environmental protection in non-international armed conflict: Developing the principles of distinction, proportionality and necessity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver