Developing a reporting guideline to improve meta-ethnography in health research: the eMERGe mixed-methods

Maggie Cunningham, Emma F. France, Nicola Ring, Isabelle Uny, Edward A.S. Duncan, Rachel J. Roberts, Ruth G. Jepson, Margaret Maxwell, Ruth L. Turley, Jane Noyes

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Limitations
    The finalised Guidance has not yet been evaluated in practice, therefore it is not possible at this stage to comment on their utility. However, we look forward to evaluating their uptake and usability in the future.
    Conclusions
    The eMERGe Reporting Guidance has been developed following a rigorous process in line with guideline development recommendations. The guidance is intended to improve the clarity and completeness of reporting of meta-ethnographies, to facilitate use of their findings to inform the design and delivery of services and interventions in health, social care and other fields. The eMERGe project developed a range of training material to support use of the guidance, which is freely available at www.emergeproject.org.
    Future work
    Meta-ethnography is an evolving qualitative evidence synthesis methodology, and future research will refine the guidance to accommodate future methodological developments. We will also investigate the impact of the eMERGe reporting guidance with a view to updating the guidance.
    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages21
    JournalHealth Services and Delivery Research (HS&DR)
    Volume7
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019

    Keywords

    • Meta-ethnography
    • Reporting
    • Guideline
    • Qualitative Evidence Synthesis
    • Systematic review
    • Pubication Standards
    • Qualitative Research
    • Research Design

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Developing a reporting guideline to improve meta-ethnography in health research: the eMERGe mixed-methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this