Die Anwendungsgrenzen des § 11 Abs. 1 DMSG

Raimund Karl

Die Anwendungsgrenzen des § 11 Abs. 1 DMSG

Translated title of the contribution: The limits of applicability of § 11 (1) DMSG

Raimund Karl

Research output: Non-textual form › Web publication/site

84 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Both archaeologists and the wider public require certainty as to how archaeological heritage law is to be interpreted. In this contribution, I prove that the interpretation of § 11 (1) Austrian Monuments Protection Law (DMSG) currently applied by the Austrian National Heritage Agency (BDA) must be illegal, since it would seriously breach the Austrian constitution, especially Art. 17 Staatsgrundgesetz (StGG). It is argued that there is only one other possible and legal interpretation of the provisions of § 11 (1) DMSG. It is recommended the BDA immediately chances its policy and practice to avoid becoming liable to massive damages.

Translated title of the contribution	The limits of applicability of § 11 (1) DMSG
Original language	German
Publisher	Internationales Österreichisches Archäologie Forum
Publication status	Published - 9 Jul 2016

Keywords

ARCHAEOLOGY
Heritage management
heritage law
Austria
National Heritage Agency
Constitutional law
Civil rights
Human rights
academic freedom
policy

Access to Document

Die Anwendungsgrenzen des § 11 Abs 1 DMSGFinal published version, 197 KBLicence: CC BY-NC

http://archaeologieforum.at/index.php/beitraege/25-forschungsberichte/7100-die-anwendungsgrenzen-des-11-abs-1-dmsg

3 Article
3 Other contribution
1 Book
1 Chapter
More
- 1 Web publication/site

Rechtswidrige Denkmalpflege: Eine (nicht nur österreichische) Realsatire über archäologische NFG-Pflichten; deren gesetzliche Grenzen; und die staatliche Denkmalpflege
Translated title of the contribution: Illegal Heritage Management: A (not just Austrian) reality satire on archaeological field research permit requirements; their legal limits; and state heritage managementKarl, R., 30 Jun 2019, Bangor: Archäologische Denkmalpflege. 446 p. (Archäologische Denkmalpflege, Sonderbände; vol. 2)
Research output: Book/Report › Book

Open Access
File
Ein Vorschlag für neue archäologische Denkmalschutzbestimmungen für Österreich.
Translated title of the contribution: A proposal for new archaeological heritage legislation for AustriaKarl, R., 8 Feb 2018, 10 p.
Research output: Other contribution

Open Access
File
Führerschein oder Einzelfahrerlaubnis? Ein Vergleich von Genehmigungspflichten für Straßenverkehr und Nachforschungen
Translated title of the contribution: Driving licence or permission for single journeys?: A comparison of permission requirements for driving cars and archaeological field researchKarl, R., 2018, In: Archäologische Informationen. 41, p. 289-303
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Open Access
File

Cite this

@misc{7bc3f7793f6046299dc1d2e3d00b593f,

title = "Die Anwendungsgrenzen des § 11 Abs. 1 DMSG",

abstract = "Both archaeologists and the wider public require certainty as to how archaeological heritage law is to be interpreted. In this contribution, I prove that the interpretation of § 11 (1) Austrian Monuments Protection Law (DMSG) currently applied by the Austrian National Heritage Agency (BDA) must be illegal, since it would seriously breach the Austrian constitution, especially Art. 17 Staatsgrundgesetz (StGG). It is argued that there is only one other possible and legal interpretation of the provisions of § 11 (1) DMSG. It is recommended the BDA immediately chances its policy and practice to avoid becoming liable to massive damages.",

keywords = "ARCHAEOLOGY, Heritage management, heritage law, Austria, National Heritage Agency, Constitutional law, Civil rights, Human rights, academic freedom, policy",

author = "Raimund Karl",

year = "2016",

month = jul,

day = "9",

language = "Almaeneg",

publisher = "Internationales {\"O}sterreichisches Arch{\"a}ologie Forum",

}

TY - ADVS

T1 - Die Anwendungsgrenzen des § 11 Abs. 1 DMSG

AU - Karl, Raimund

PY - 2016/7/9

Y1 - 2016/7/9

N2 - Both archaeologists and the wider public require certainty as to how archaeological heritage law is to be interpreted. In this contribution, I prove that the interpretation of § 11 (1) Austrian Monuments Protection Law (DMSG) currently applied by the Austrian National Heritage Agency (BDA) must be illegal, since it would seriously breach the Austrian constitution, especially Art. 17 Staatsgrundgesetz (StGG). It is argued that there is only one other possible and legal interpretation of the provisions of § 11 (1) DMSG. It is recommended the BDA immediately chances its policy and practice to avoid becoming liable to massive damages.

AB - Both archaeologists and the wider public require certainty as to how archaeological heritage law is to be interpreted. In this contribution, I prove that the interpretation of § 11 (1) Austrian Monuments Protection Law (DMSG) currently applied by the Austrian National Heritage Agency (BDA) must be illegal, since it would seriously breach the Austrian constitution, especially Art. 17 Staatsgrundgesetz (StGG). It is argued that there is only one other possible and legal interpretation of the provisions of § 11 (1) DMSG. It is recommended the BDA immediately chances its policy and practice to avoid becoming liable to massive damages.

KW - ARCHAEOLOGY

KW - Heritage management

KW - heritage law

KW - Austria

KW - National Heritage Agency

KW - Constitutional law

KW - Civil rights

KW - Human rights

KW - academic freedom

KW - policy

M3 - Safe Gwe / Cyhoeddiad Gwe

PB - Internationales Österreichisches Archäologie Forum

ER -

Die Anwendungsgrenzen des § 11 Abs. 1 DMSG

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Research output

Rechtswidrige Denkmalpflege: Eine (nicht nur österreichische) Realsatire über archäologische NFG-Pflichten; deren gesetzliche Grenzen; und die staatliche Denkmalpflege

Ein Vorschlag für neue archäologische Denkmalschutzbestimmungen für Österreich.

Führerschein oder Einzelfahrerlaubnis? Ein Vergleich von Genehmigungspflichten für Straßenverkehr und Nachforschungen

Cite this