Dying at home of cancer: whose needs are being met? The experience of family carers and healthcare professionals (a multiperspective qualitative study)

Jackie Pottle, Julia Hiscock, Richard D Neal, Marlise Poolman

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    253 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Objectives
    Supporting patients to die in the place of their choosing is an important aspect of end of life care. Our study set out to answer the question: ‘How does the home environment influence perceptions of quality of death, and the experience of caring for the dying at home, for family carers and healthcare professionals (HCPs)?
    Methods
    A qualitative approach, using multiperspective interviews with bereaved family
    carers (n=15) and a nominated HCP (n=13) ensured depth of insight gained into supporting a home death. The semistructured interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using Framework.


    Results
    We found that the home environment enabled normality, a sense of control and
    individualised care which family carers often perceived as contributing towards a good death. However, the home environment created challenges for both family carers and HCPs, due to the differing and at times conflicting needs of the dying person and their family carers.
    Conclusions
    We have shed light on the complexity of balancing the demands and the satisfaction of caring for someone dying at home. The ability to manage these conflicting needs influenced whether carers perceived the home setting as the best place for the person to have received care in their last days of life.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere6
    JournalBMJ Supportive and Palliative Care
    Volume10
    Issue number1
    Early online date16 Jan 2017
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2020

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Dying at home of cancer: whose needs are being met? The experience of family carers and healthcare professionals (a multiperspective qualitative study)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this