Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effectiveness of the Interdisciplinary Home-bAsed Reablement Programme (I-HARP) on improving functional independence of people living with dementia: a multicentre, pragmatic, randomised, open-label, controlled trial

  • Yun-Hee Jeon
  • , J Simpson
  • , J Fethney
  • , L Krein
  • , M Shin
  • , Lee-Fay Low
  • , Bob Woods
  • , L Mowszowski,
  • , S Hilmer
  • , S Naismith
  • , L Clemson
  • , Henry Brodaty
  • , V Naganathan
  • , A Miller Amberber
  • , D Kenny
  • , L Gitlin
  • , S Szanton
  • The University of Sydney
  • University of Sydney
  • UNSW Sydney
  • Macquarie University, Sydney
  • University of Queensland
  • Drexel University, USA
  • Johns Hopkins University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

43 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: We investigated the effectiveness of an Interdisciplinary Home-bAsed Reablement Programme (I-HARP) on improving functional independence, health and well-being of people with dementia, family carer outcomes and costs. Method: A multicentre pragmatic parallel-arm randomised controlled trial compared I-HARP to usual care in community-dwelling people with mild to moderate dementia and their family carers in Sydney, Australia (2018–2022). I-HARP is a 4-month, home-based, dementia rehabilitation model delivered by an interdisciplinary team. Assessments were conducted at baseline (time-1), 4-month (time-2) and 12-month (time-3) follow-up. The primary outcome measure was the client’s functional independence using the Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) scale at time-2, based on intention-to-treat analyses. Result: Of 130 recruited client-carer dyads, 116 dyads (58/group) completed the trial. The I-HARP group were not significantly better in most outcome measures than usual care at both time-2 and time-3; with the only statistically significant difference being a reduction in home environment hazards at time-2. Post hoc subgroup analysis of 66 clients with mild dementia found significantly better functional independence in the intervention group compared with those in usual care: difference 8.99 on DAD (95% CI 1.21, 16.79) at time-2 and difference 12.16 (95% CI 1.93, 22.38) at time-3. Economic evaluation suggests potentially lower resource use in I-HARP compared with usual care, but the cost-effectiveness is uncertain. Conclusion: Primary outcomes were not met for a population of people with dementia, with severity ranging from mild to moderate and severe. The I-HARP model appeared to benefit functional independence of participants with mild dementia, with potential cost savings. Trial registration number: ACTRN12618000600246.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-11
JournalJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
Early online date16 Jan 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 16 Jan 2025

Keywords

  • DEMENTIA
  • REHABILITATION

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of the Interdisciplinary Home-bAsed Reablement Programme (I-HARP) on improving functional independence of people living with dementia: a multicentre, pragmatic, randomised, open-label, controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this