Ethical considerations when conservation research involves people

Steph Brittain, Harriet Ibbett, Emiel de Lange, Leejiah Dorward, Simon Hoyte, Agnese Marino, EJ Milner-Gulland, Julia Newth, Sarobidy Rakotonarivo, Diogo Verissimo, Jerome Lewis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

327 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Social science is becoming increasingly important in conservation, with more studies involving methodologies that collect data from and about people. Conservation science is a normative and applied discipline designed to support and inform management and practice. Poor research practice risks harming participants, researchers, and can leave negative legacies. Often, those at the forefront of field‐based research are early‐career researchers, many of whom enter their first research experience ill‐prepared for the ethical conundrums they may face. Here, we draw on our own experiences as early‐career researchers to illuminate how ethical challenges arise during conservation research that involves human participants. Specifically, we discuss ethical review procedures, conflicts of values, and power relations, and provide broad recommendations on how to navigate ethical challenges when they arise during research. We encourage greater engagement with ethical review processes and highlight the pressing need to develop ethical guidelines for conservation research that involves human participants.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)925-933
JournalConservation Biology
Volume34
Issue number4
Early online date18 Jan 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Aug 2020

Keywords

  • institutional review boards
  • power dynamics
  • values
  • legacy
  • social science
  • reflexivity
  • fieldwork

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ethical considerations when conservation research involves people'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this