Abstract
Ljiljana Radenovic’s “Philosophy of my Faith” (2021) makes the valuable point that for a philosophical account of religious belief to be satisfactory it must adequately address what it is like to have religious belief. The challenge, Radenovic notes, is that contemporary philosophical debates about religion are at times different to, or have no serious interest in, discussions about what it is like to believe. This division needs to be bridged, but I think that the way how Radenovic goes about doing so is unsuccessful. It is therefore only fitting, due to my support of the method but disagreement with the conclusion, to write a reply which follows suit—let us conduct our own meditation on religious belief and then compare our conclusions with Radenovic’s.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Volume | 10 |
| No. | 12 |
| Specialist publication | Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2021 |
Keywords
- philosophy
- religion
- Wittgenstein
- belief-in
- belief-that
- faith
- God
- Hume
- Phillips
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Faith Seeking Understanding: A Reply to Radenovic’s ‘Philosophy of my Faith’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.-
Finding Spirituality in a Godless World
Ellis, D., 4 Aug 2020.Research output: Contribution to conference › Abstract › peer-review
-
Philosophy cannot resolve the question ‘How should we live?’
Ellis, D., 1 May 2020, AEON.Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › Article
Open Access -
Religion in the Modern World—Celebrating Pluralism and Diversity, written by Ward, Keith
Ellis, D., 19 Jun 2020, In: Journal of Empirical Theology. 33, 1, p. 149-151 3 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Book/Film/Article review › peer-review
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver