Further exploration of dissemination bias in qualitative research required to facilitate assessment within qualitative evidence syntheses

Ingrid Toews, Andrew Booth, Rigmor C. Berg, Simon Lewin, Claire Glenton, Heather M. Munthe-Kaas, Jane Noyes, Sara Schroter, Joerg M. Meerpohl

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    266 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVES: To conceptualise and discuss dissemination bias in qualitative research.

    RESULTS: It is likely that the mechanisms leading to dissemination bias in quantitative research, including time lag, language, gray literature, and truncation bias also contribute to dissemination bias in qualitative research. These conceptual considerations have informed the development of a research agenda.

    CONCLUSION: Further exploration of dissemination bias in qualitative research is needed, including the extent of non-dissemination and related dissemination bias, and how to assess dissemination bias within qualitative evidence syntheses. We also need to consider the mechanisms through which dissemination bias in qualitative research could occur to explore approaches for reducing it.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)133-139
    JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
    Volume88
    Issue numberAugust
    Early online date20 Apr 2017
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2017

    Keywords

    • Journal Article

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Further exploration of dissemination bias in qualitative research required to facilitate assessment within qualitative evidence syntheses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this