Abstract
The Austrian National Heritage Agency (BDA) has maintained for decades that every excavation and any other reseach in situ to discover archaeological monuments requires a permit issued by the BDA according to § 11 (1) Austrian Monuments Protection Law (DMSG). Two recent Court judgements, on by the Austrian Federal Court of Administrative Appeals (BvWG) and one by the Austrian Supreme Administrative Court (VwGH), demonstrate that this legal opinion was and is false. Rather, it seems - in the light of these judgements - as if an "excavation permit" were only required for excavations and any other research targeting archaeological monuments scheduled according to §§ 2a or 3 DMSG or such where a public interest in their protection has at least been considered probable in publicly accessible expert witness statements. De facto, this would mean that, except for research on the c. 1,100 scheduled archaeological sites in Austria, no "excavation permit" would be required for any research in situ (including excavations) to discover archaeology.
| Translated title of the contribution | "Excavation permit"? Not required!: Two sigfnificant judgements auf Austrian Courts from 2017 on archaeological heritage management and their consequences |
|---|---|
| Original language | German |
| Media of output | Scientific blog |
| Edition | 2 |
| Volume | 2018 |
| Publication status | Published - 11 Feb 2018 |
Publication series
| Name | Archäologische Denkmalpflege |
|---|---|
| ISSN (Print) | 2516-4309 |
Keywords
- ARCHAEOLOGY
- Heritage
- Heritage law
- Heritage management
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '"Excavation permit"? Not required! Two sigfnificant judgements auf Austrian Courts from 2017 on archaeological heritage management and their consequences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.-
Authorities and subjects? The legal framework for public participation in Austrian archaeology
Karl, R., 26 May 2019, In: European Journal of Postclassical Archaeologies. 9, p. 219-256Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open AccessFile -
Rechtswidrige Denkmalpflege: Eine (nicht nur österreichische) Realsatire über archäologische NFG-Pflichten; deren gesetzliche Grenzen; und die staatliche Denkmalpflege
Karl, R., 30 Jun 2019, Bangor: Archäologische Denkmalpflege. 446 p. (Archäologische Denkmalpflege, Sonderbände; vol. 2)Translated title of the contribution :Illegal Heritage Management: A (not just Austrian) reality satire on archaeological field research permit requirements; their legal limits; and state heritage management Research output: Book/Report › Book
Open AccessFile -
Against retention in situ: How to best preserve archaeology for 'future generations'?
Karl, R., 11 Feb 2018Research output: Other contribution
Open AccessFile
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver