High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity steady-state training in UK cardiac rehabilitation programmes (HIIT or MISS UK): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation

Gordon McGregor, Simon Nichols, Thomas Hamborg, Lucy Bryning, Rhiannon Edwards, David Markland, Jenny Mercer, Stefan Birkett, Stewart Ennis, Richard Powell, Brian Begg, Mark Haykowsky, Prithwish Banerjee, Lee Ingle, Rob Shave, Karianne Backx

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    303 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Current international guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation (CR) advocate moderate-intensity exercise training (MISS, moderate-intensity steady state). This recommendation predates significant advances in medical therapy for coronary heart disease (CHD) and may not be the most appropriate strategy for the ‘modern’ patient with CHD. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) appears to be a safe and effective alternative, resulting in greater improvements in peak oxygen uptake (VO2 peak). To date, HIIT trials have predominantly been proof-of-concept studies in the laboratory setting and conducted outside the UK. The purpose of this multicentre randomised controlled trial is to compare the effects of HIIT and MISS training in patients with CHD attending UK CR programmes.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number6:e012843
    Pages (from-to)1-9
    Number of pages9
    JournalBMJ Open
    Volume6
    Issue number11
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 18 Nov 2016

    Keywords

    • High intensity interval training; HIIT; cardiac rehabilitation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity steady-state training in UK cardiac rehabilitation programmes (HIIT or MISS UK): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this