How to Philosophize Like an Academic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

How to write a philosophy paper? This paper seeks to answer that question. It proposes a progressive six‐stage methodology for developing philosophical research, each step building in more rigorous forms of peer scrutiny: (1) independent ideation; (2) conceptualization and casual discussion; (3) short abstract and work‐in‐progress seminars; (4) referenced abstract and conference presentations; (5) first draft and written peer feedback; and (6) second draft and formal peer review. This framework shows why current trends, such as requiring complete papers for conference submissions or presenting already published work, distort the purpose of academic mechanisms, reducing their effectiveness in strengthening philosophical arguments. By moving forwards rather than backwards through the research process, philosophers can make full use of collaborative structures like seminars, conferences, and peer review. The result is a more methodologically rigorous approach to writing philosophy papers that preserves the integrity of academic practice.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages6
JournalMetaphilosophy
Early online date13 Oct 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 13 Oct 2025

Keywords

  • collaboration in the humanities
  • philosophy paper writing
  • peer review in philosophy
  • humanities research process
  • pathway to publication
  • philosophical methodology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How to Philosophize Like an Academic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this