Issues Related to the Frequency of Exploratory Analyses by Evidence Review Groups in the NICE Single Technology Appraisal Process

Eva Kaltenthaler; Christopher Carroll; Daniel Hill-McManus; Alison Scope; Michael Holmes; Stephen Rice; Micah Rose; Paul Tappenden; Nerys Woolacott

doi:10.1007/s41669-016-0001-4

Issues Related to the Frequency of Exploratory Analyses by Evidence Review Groups in the NICE Single Technology Appraisal Process

Eva Kaltenthaler
, Christopher Carroll
, Daniel Hill-McManus
, Alison Scope
, Michael Holmes
, Stephen Rice
, Micah Rose
, Paul Tappenden
, Nerys Woolacott

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Evidence Review Groups (ERGs) critically appraise company submissions as part of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Single Technology Appraisal (STA) process. As part of their critique of the evidence submitted by companies, the ERGs undertake exploratory analyses to explore uncertainties in the company's model. The aim of this study was to explore pre-defined factors that might influence or predict the extent of ERG exploratory analyses.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	99-108
Number of pages	10
Journal	PharmacoEconomics - Open
Volume	1
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-016-0001-4
Publication status	Published - Jun 2017

Access to Document

10.1007/s41669-016-0001-4Licence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{9251cf3604804dd0bf890597fdf84878,

title = "Issues Related to the Frequency of Exploratory Analyses by Evidence Review Groups in the NICE Single Technology Appraisal Process",

abstract = "Evidence Review Groups (ERGs) critically appraise company submissions as part of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Single Technology Appraisal (STA) process. As part of their critique of the evidence submitted by companies, the ERGs undertake exploratory analyses to explore uncertainties in the company's model. The aim of this study was to explore pre-defined factors that might influence or predict the extent of ERG exploratory analyses.",

author = "Eva Kaltenthaler and Christopher Carroll and Daniel Hill-McManus and Alison Scope and Michael Holmes and Stephen Rice and Micah Rose and Paul Tappenden and Nerys Woolacott",

year = "2017",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1007/s41669-016-0001-4",

language = "English",

volume = "1",

pages = "99--108",

journal = "PharmacoEconomics - Open",

issn = "2509-4254",

publisher = "Adis",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Issues Related to the Frequency of Exploratory Analyses by Evidence Review Groups in the NICE Single Technology Appraisal Process

AU - Kaltenthaler, Eva

AU - Carroll, Christopher

AU - Hill-McManus, Daniel

AU - Scope, Alison

AU - Holmes, Michael

AU - Rice, Stephen

AU - Rose, Micah

AU - Tappenden, Paul

AU - Woolacott, Nerys

PY - 2017/6

Y1 - 2017/6

N2 - Evidence Review Groups (ERGs) critically appraise company submissions as part of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Single Technology Appraisal (STA) process. As part of their critique of the evidence submitted by companies, the ERGs undertake exploratory analyses to explore uncertainties in the company's model. The aim of this study was to explore pre-defined factors that might influence or predict the extent of ERG exploratory analyses.

AB - Evidence Review Groups (ERGs) critically appraise company submissions as part of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Single Technology Appraisal (STA) process. As part of their critique of the evidence submitted by companies, the ERGs undertake exploratory analyses to explore uncertainties in the company's model. The aim of this study was to explore pre-defined factors that might influence or predict the extent of ERG exploratory analyses.

U2 - 10.1007/s41669-016-0001-4

DO - 10.1007/s41669-016-0001-4

M3 - Article

SN - 2509-4254

VL - 1

SP - 99

EP - 108

JO - PharmacoEconomics - Open

JF - PharmacoEconomics - Open

IS - 2

ER -

Issues Related to the Frequency of Exploratory Analyses by Evidence Review Groups in the NICE Single Technology Appraisal Process

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this