Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Making messy data work for conservation

  • Andrew D.M. Dobson
  • , EJ Milner-Gulland
  • , Nicholas J Aebischer
  • , Colin Beale
  • , Robert Brozovic
  • , Peter Coals
  • , Rob Critchlow
  • , Anthony Dancer
  • , Michelle Greve
  • , Amy Hinsley
  • , Harriet Ibbett
  • , Alison Johnston
  • , Tomothy Kuiper
  • , Steven Le Comber
  • , Simon P Mahood
  • , Jennifer F. Moore
  • , Erlend B Nilsen
  • , Michael J.O. Pocock
  • , Anthony Quinn
  • , Henry Travers
  • Paulo Wilfred, Joss Wright, Aidan Keane
  • Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust
  • Frankfurt Zoological Society
  • WildCru,Oxford University
  • University of York
  • ZSL Institute of Zoology, London.
  • University of Pretoria
  • Cornell University
  • Queen Mary University of London
  • University of Florida
  • Norweigian Institute for Nature Research
  • Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford
  • University of Southampton
  • University of Edinburgh
  • Wildlife Conservation Society
  • The Open University of Tanzania
  • University of Oxford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

144 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Conservationists increasingly use unstructured observational data, such as citizen science records or ranger patrol observations, to guide decision making. These datasets are often large and relatively cheap to collect, and they have enormous potential. However, the resulting data are generally ‘‘messy,’’ and their use can incur considerable costs, some of which are hidden. We present an overview of the opportunities and limitations associated with messy data by explaining how the preferences, skills, and incentives of data collectors affect the quality of the information they contain and the investment required to unlock their potential. Drawing widely from across the sciences, we break down elements of the observation process in order to highlight likely sources of bias and error while emphasizing the importance of cross-disciplinary collaboration. We pro- pose a framework for appraising messy data to guide those engaging with these types of dataset and make them work for conservation and broader sustainability applications.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)455-465
JournalOne Earth
Volume2
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 May 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Making messy data work for conservation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this