Measuring paternal discrepancy and its public health consequences

Mark A Bellis, Karen Hughes, Sara Hughes, John R. Ashton

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Paternal discrepancy (PD) occurs when a child is identified as being biologically fathered by someone other than the man who believes he is the father. This paper examines published evidence on levels of PD and its public health consequences. Rates vary between studies from 0.8% to 30% (median 3.7%, n = 17). Using information from genetic and behavioural studies, the article identifies those who conceive younger, live in deprivation, are in long term relationships (rather than marriages), or in certain cultural groups are at higher risk. Public health consequences of PD being exposed include family break up and violence. However, leaving PD undiagnosed means cases having incorrect information on their genetics and fathers continuing to suspect that children may not be theirs. Increasing paternity testing and use of DNA techniques in clinical and judicial procedures means more cases of PD will be identified. Given developing roles for individual's genetics in decisions made by health services, private services (for example, insurance), and even in personal lifestyle decisions, the dearth of intelligence on how and when PD should be exposed urgently needs addressing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)749-54
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Volume59
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2005
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Child
  • DNA Fingerprinting
  • Extramarital Relations
  • Family
  • Female
  • Genetic Techniques
  • Health Services Accessibility
  • Humans
  • Incidental Findings
  • Male
  • Paternity
  • Prevalence
  • Public Health
  • Risk Factors
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • Tissue and Organ Procurement
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring paternal discrepancy and its public health consequences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this