Abstract
Theresourcesrequiredtohaltbiodiversitydeclinesareestimatedtobemanytimesmorethancurrentinvestment,underpinningcallstoincreasefinancialsupportforconservation,andtodevelopmethodsforallocatingfundsmoreefficiently(McCarthyetal.,2012;McDonaldetal.,2015).Conservationtriageisanimportantpartofthelatterstrategy,withproponentsarguingthatbyexplicitlyprioritizingresourcestowardtargets(e.g.,particularspeciesorpopulations)identifiedasgeneratingthegreatestbenefitsforagiveninvestment,triageavoidsusingresourcesoncasesinwhichconservationeffortisunlikelytomakeadifference(i.e.,improvementisunlikelyorisnear-certainirrespectiveofinvestment;Bottrilletal.,2008;Schneideretal.,2010;Gerber,2016).However,triagehasbeencriticizedonseveralgrounds,suchaspotentiallysignalingtodecision-makersthatsomeextinctionsorpopulationlossesareacceptable,andthescientific,ethical,andpracticalargumentshavebeendebatedwithoutreachingclearconsensus(Bottrilletal.,2008;JachowskiandKesler,2008;Parretal.,2008).Ourprimaryaimhereisnottorevisitthesearguments,buttohighlightanadditionalissue—thepotentialforsubstantial,unforeseenchangesinthefuturecostsofconservation—andinvestigatehowthisissuemightaffecttriageandnon-triageapproaches.
CHANGES
CHANGES
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue number | 113 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 28 Sept 2016 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Moving the Goalposts: Possible Effects of Changes in Opportunity Costs on Conservation Triage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver