Moving the Goalposts: Possible Effects of Changes in Opportunity Costs on Conservation Triage

Paul Woodcock, Matthew Hayward

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    139 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Theresourcesrequiredtohaltbiodiversitydeclinesareestimatedtobemanytimesmorethancurrentinvestment,underpinningcallstoincreasefinancialsupportforconservation,andtodevelopmethodsforallocatingfundsmoreefficiently(McCarthyetal.,2012;McDonaldetal.,2015).Conservationtriageisanimportantpartofthelatterstrategy,withproponentsarguingthatbyexplicitlyprioritizingresourcestowardtargets(e.g.,particularspeciesorpopulations)identifiedasgeneratingthegreatestbenefitsforagiveninvestment,triageavoidsusingresourcesoncasesinwhichconservationeffortisunlikelytomakeadifference(i.e.,improvementisunlikelyorisnear-certainirrespectiveofinvestment;Bottrilletal.,2008;Schneideretal.,2010;Gerber,2016).However,triagehasbeencriticizedonseveralgrounds,suchaspotentiallysignalingtodecision-makersthatsomeextinctionsorpopulationlossesareacceptable,andthescientific,ethical,andpracticalargumentshavebeendebatedwithoutreachingclearconsensus(Bottrilletal.,2008;JachowskiandKesler,2008;Parretal.,2008).Ourprimaryaimhereisnottorevisitthesearguments,buttohighlightanadditionalissue—thepotentialforsubstantial,unforeseenchangesinthefuturecostsofconservation—andinvestigatehowthisissuemightaffecttriageandnon-triageapproaches.
    CHANGES
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalFrontiers in Ecology and Evolution
    Volume4
    Issue number113
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 28 Sept 2016

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Moving the Goalposts: Possible Effects of Changes in Opportunity Costs on Conservation Triage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this