Abstract
Since the beginnings of our subject in the German speaking countries, a mostly unreflected, firmly logical positivist epistemology has been the fundament of our practice. Established by ‘fathers’ of modern archaeology like Virchow and Hoernes, we believe that “...beginning and progress...” in archaeology lie in “... the observation of plain fact, in the stringing together of individual, of themselves unremarkable observations to incontrovertible knowledge...” (Hoernes 1892, 43). Virchow (quoted in Hoernes 1892, 70) hoped that the anthropological disciplines would progress “...by purely inductive means...” in the future. One of the necessary (epistemo-)logical preconditions for the possibility to arrive at proof positive by inductive reasoning is the completeness of observations. And since it has become disciplinary dogma that only inductive reasoning based on correct and complete observations of archaeology can create reliable, i.e. ‘true’, knowledge about archaeological things (and people), a particular relationship of the discipline with these things necessarily follows: every archaeological object is a infinitely valuable treasure, is sacrosanct, must be conserved forever. Only this can guarantee that our observations remain repeatable and thus allow our discipline progress by no other than inductive means. Industrial hoarding thus is a necessary consequence of our epistemological approach.
This paper demonstrates that the approach to professional archaeological collecting resulting from this is both causing suffering within the discipline and causes damage to our subject and the objects we pretend need to be maintained ‘in perpetuity’, and is ultimately unsustainable. Perhaps even more significantly, the resulting professional practice exhibits virtually all diagnostic criteria of a recently newly-defined obsessive-compulsive spectrum mental disorder, of compulsive hoarding. It is thus argued that the discipline of archaeology as a community of like-minded and like-educated professionals in the German speaking countries exhibits a serious social functionality disorder: it is, quite literally, sick and in urgent need of therapy.
This paper demonstrates that the approach to professional archaeological collecting resulting from this is both causing suffering within the discipline and causes damage to our subject and the objects we pretend need to be maintained ‘in perpetuity’, and is ultimately unsustainable. Perhaps even more significantly, the resulting professional practice exhibits virtually all diagnostic criteria of a recently newly-defined obsessive-compulsive spectrum mental disorder, of compulsive hoarding. It is thus argued that the discipline of archaeology as a community of like-minded and like-educated professionals in the German speaking countries exhibits a serious social functionality disorder: it is, quite literally, sick and in urgent need of therapy.
| Translated title of the contribution | My preciousssss...: Compulsive hoarding, epistemology and socially challenged archaeology |
|---|---|
| Original language | German |
| Title of host publication | Massendinghaltung in der Archäologie |
| Subtitle of host publication | Der Material Turn und die Ur- und Frühgeschichte |
| Editors | Kerstin P. Hofmann, Thomas Meier, Doreen Mölders, Stefan Schreiber |
| Place of Publication | Leiden |
| Publisher | Sidestone Press |
| Pages | 43-69 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9789088903465, 9088903468 |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2016 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- ARCHAEOLOGY
- collecting
- museums
- German archaeology
- Austrian archaeology
- THEORY & METHODS
- positivism
- compulsive hoarding
- mental disorder
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'My preciousssss... Compulsive hoarding, epistemology and socially challenged archaeology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.-
Rechtswidrige Denkmalpflege: Eine (nicht nur österreichische) Realsatire über archäologische NFG-Pflichten; deren gesetzliche Grenzen; und die staatliche Denkmalpflege
Karl, R., 30 Jun 2019, Bangor: Archäologische Denkmalpflege. 446 p. (Archäologische Denkmalpflege, Sonderbände; vol. 2)Translated title of the contribution :Illegal Heritage Management: A (not just Austrian) reality satire on archaeological field research permit requirements; their legal limits; and state heritage management Research output: Book/Report › Book
Open AccessFile -
Wie (Denkmalschutz-) Gesetze funktionieren sollten
Karl, R., 2 Apr 2018Translated title of the contribution :How heritage laws should work Research output: Other contribution
Open AccessFile -
Die Markt- und andere Krankheiten der Archäologie
Karl, R., 26 Sept 2017, 6 p. Archaeologik Blog.Translated title of the contribution :The market and other illnesses of archaeology Research output: Other contribution
Open AccessFile
Activities
- 1 Oral presentation
-
Every Sherd is Sacred - Compulsive Hoarding in Archaeology
Karl, R. (Speaker)
13 Sept 2014Activity: Talk or presentation › Oral presentation
File
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver