Perceiving emotion and sex from the body: evidence from the Garner task for independent processes

Marco Gandolfo, Paul Downing

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    453 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The appearance of the body signals socially relevant states and traits, but the how these cues are perceived is not well understood. Here we examined judgments of emotion and sex from the body’s appearance. Understanding how we extract these cues is important because they are both salient and socially relevant. Participants viewed body images and either reported the emotion expressed by each body while ignoring its sex, or else reported the sex while ignoring its emotion. Following Garner’s logic, two types of blocks were compared. In control blocks, the task- irrelevant dimension was fixed (e.g. all male in an emotion judgment task), whereas in orthogonal blocks it varied orthogonally to the task-relevant dimension (e.g. male-female). Where two dimensions draw on shared processes, interference results in relatively slower responses during orthogonal blocks. In contrast, a finding of no Garner interference – efficient selection of the task-relevant dimension – is taken to reflect independent processes. Bayesian analyses revealed evidence of no Garner interference between sex and emotion judgments, showing that extraction of these distinct signals from the body’s appearance proceeds along largely parallel processing streams. These findings are informative about the mental architecture behind our perception of socially relevant characteristics of other people.
    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages11
    JournalCognition and Emotion
    Early online date24 Jun 2019
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 25 Jun 2019

    Keywords

    • Emotional body expression
    • attention
    • body posture
    • body shape
    • interference
    • sex

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Perceiving emotion and sex from the body: evidence from the Garner task for independent processes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this