Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Priority questions for the next decade of blue carbon science

  • Peter I Macreadie
  • , George E Biddulph
  • , Pere Masque
  • , Hilary Kennedy
  • , Jimena Samper-Villarreal
  • , J Patrick Megonigal
  • , Hannah K Morrissette
  • , Tania E Romero-Gonzalez
  • , Vanessa Hatje
  • , Jana Friedrich
  • , Sigit D Sasmito
  • , Kenta Watanabe
  • , Inés Mazarrasa
  • , Dorte Krause-Jensen
  • , Janine B Adams
  • , Miguel Cifuentes-Jara
  • , Ariane Arias-Ortiz
  • , Andre S Rovai
  • , Milica Stankovic
  • , Kirsten Isensee
  • Ana M Queirós, Luzhen Chen, Jorge Herrera-Silveira, Catriona L Hurd, Rashid Ismail, Ken W Krauss, Anna Lafratta, Maria M Palacios, William E N Austin
  • RMIT University, Melbourne
  • University of St. Andrews
  • Edith Cowan University, Perth
  • Centro de Investigación en Ciencias del Mar y Limnología (CIMAR)
  • Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Maryland
  • Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
  • CIEnAm
  • IAEA Marine Environment Laboratories
  • James Cook University
  • Port and Airport Research Institute
  • IHCantabria - Instituto de Hidráulica Ambiental de la Universidad de Cantabria
  • Aarhus University
  • Nelson Mandela University, South Africa
  • Departament de Física
  • Prince of Songkla University
  • Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO
  • Plymouth Marine Laboratory
  • Xiamen University, China
  • Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados de México
  • University of Tasmania
  • University of Dar es Salaam
  • Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium (LUMCON)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Blue carbon ecosystems, classically defined as mangroves, tidal marshes and seagrasses, but increasingly expanded to include ecosystems such as tidal flats, macroalgal forests and shelf sediments, contribute to climate change mitigation and biodiversity support. Here, seven years after the last global assessment of research priorities, we conducted a priority-setting exercise to identify persistent knowledge and implementation gaps, and the strategic priorities that must be addressed to enable scalable, high-integrity and equitable management of blue carbon ecosystems in a rapidly evolving policy and finance landscape. The highest priority focuses on managing blue carbon ecosystems to support coastal communities while integrating traditional ecological knowledge, emphasizing the essential role of social legitimacy and equity in enabling scalable, long-lasting outcomes. Additional priorities focus on developing cost-effective restoration methods, improving the accuracy of greenhouse gas flux estimates, quantifying the impacts of human activities on carbon cycling and integrating co-benefits such as biodiversity and coastal protection into natural capital frameworks. Emerging technologies like remote sensing, machine learning and data-sharing platforms are also highlighted as transformative tools to fill knowledge gaps and scale solutions. Collectively, these priorities highlight the complexity of blue carbon science and the need for inclusive interdisciplinary approaches that support the resilience and livelihoods of coastal communities. [Abstract copyright: © 2026. The Author(s).]
Original languageEnglish
JournalNature Ecology and Evolution
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Mar 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action
  2. SDG 14 - Life Below Water
    SDG 14 Life Below Water

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Priority questions for the next decade of blue carbon science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this