Questionable policy for large carnivore hunting

  • S. Creel
  • , M. Becker
  • , D. Christianson
  • , E. Droge
  • , N. Hammerschlag
  • , M.W. Hayward
  • , U. Karanth
  • , A. Loveridge
  • , D.W. Macdonald
  • , W. Matandiko
  • , J. M'soka
  • , D. Murray
  • , E. Rosenblatt
  • , P. Schuette

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Terrestrial large carnivores have great ecological, economic and cultural importance, but are in global decline due to habitat loss, prey depletion, poaching, retributive killing and regulated hunting. While regulated carnivore hunting potentially reduces conflict with humans and livestock, increases social tolerance and provides revenue for conservation, it can also drive population declines. Some policies regulating carnivore hunting acknowledge and address negative effects on demography and population dynamics, but others do not. Using wolves as an example, we identify four aspects of hunting policy that do not align well with ecological theory and data, and suggest resolutions for these problems that have broad relevance to exploited carnivore populations.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1473-1475
    JournalScience
    Volume350
    Issue number6267
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 18 Dec 2015

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 15 - Life on Land
      SDG 15 Life on Land

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Questionable policy for large carnivore hunting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this