Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Radiotherapy quality assurance for the PEACE 1 trial: An individual case review analysis

  • Najlaa Alyamani
  • , Enrico Clementel
  • , Paul Sargos
  • , Pierre Blanchard
  • , Stephane Supiot
  • , Philippe Ronchin
  • , Pascal Pommier
  • , Thomas Duberge
  • , Marlon Silva
  • , Yasser Hammoud
  • , Ali Hasbini
  • , Jonathan Khalifa
  • , Khemara Gnep
  • , Christopher Scrase
  • , Jordi Saez
  • , Laure Vieillevigne
  • , Melissa Christiaens
  • , Thomas Zilli
  • , Hélène Ribault
  • , Alberto Bossi
  • Karim Fizazi, Nicolaus Andratschke
  • European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters Brussels Belgium
  • Department of Radiotherapy Institut Bergonie Bordeaux France
  • University of Paris-Saclay
  • Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest
  • Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie
  • Centre Léon Bérard
  • La Croix-Rouge française Centre Saint Louis
  • Centre François Baclesse
  • CHU Jean-Minjoz
  • CFRO-Clinique Pasteur
  • Oncopole Claudius Regaud
  • Centre Eugène Marquis
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona
  • Institut Claudius Regaud-Institut Universitaire du Cancer
  • University Hospitals Leuven
  • University of Geneva
  • UNICANCER Paris France
  • Institut Gustave Roussy
  • University Hospital Zurich University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

PURPOSE: Radiotherapy quality assurance (RTQA) is essential for ensuring adherence to trial protocols. This paper summarizes the individual case review (ICR) results from the PEACE-1 trial, a phase-III study investigates standard of care (androgen deprivation therapy with or without docetaxel) with or without local radiotherapy; and with or without abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participating institutions submitted radiotherapy (RT) plans for central review, assessing protocol compliance in target volume and organs at risk (OARs) delineation, as well as dose specifications. ICRs were conducted either retrospectively (r-ICRs), after starting RT, or prospectively (p-ICRs), before RT initiation. Case reviews were categorized as acceptable per protocol, acceptable variation, or unacceptable variation based on delineation and dose and plan parameters.

RESULTS: Out of 585 patients in the RT arms, 527 (90%) had r-ICRs, primarily using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Delineation review approved 417 (87%) r-ICRs and 44 (92%) p-ICRs. The main reasons for unacceptable delineation were erroneous clinical target volume (CTV) delineation. In dose and plan reviews, 399 (96%) r-ICRs cases and 46 (96%) p-ICRs were approved, with unacceptable cases primarily due to PTV dose distribution issues.

CONCLUSION: RTQA is crucial in prostate cancer trials, primarily for proper target volume delineation. It is recommended to omit r-ICRs due to resource demands and lack of impact on RTQA outcomes, using limited p-ICRs with early feedback for site deviations and reserving full p-ICRs for trails with new techniques or dose regimens.

CLINICALTRIALS: gov: NCT01957436.

Original languageEnglish
Article number110780
JournalRadiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
Volume206
Early online date7 Feb 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 7 Feb 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • PEACE-1
  • RTQA
  • Quality assurance
  • Prostate cancer

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Radiotherapy quality assurance for the PEACE 1 trial: An individual case review analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this