Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Recent Developments about Lay Judges in the European Union

  • Michigan State University
  • Cornell University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

350 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Lay participation adds to the quality of the administration of justice. Few people, though, have an idea about the extent to which EU member states draw on lay judges. This article for the first time provides an overview on lay participation in civil and criminal justice in EU countries.
Of the EU member states, the majority has some form of lay participation in criminal courts, mostly mixed courts (18 countries), in which lay and professional judges deliberate on cases together. Also in civil courts, a majority employ lay decision-makers, where 16 states have mixed courts. Juries, single lay judges, or panels exclusively consisting of lay people have become rare. Only four EU countries – Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, and The Netherlands – have no lay participation in criminal and civil trials. In some countries, lay participation is widespread, including for example, Austria, Finland, France, Germany, and Sweden. The article also identifies factors influencing the extent of lay participation in the courts. In conclusion: Lay judges are part of European legal culture.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages13
JournalLaikos
Volume1
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Lay participation
  • European Union
  • Juries
  • Lay judges
  • Mixed courts
  • Civil courts
  • Criminal courts

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Recent Developments about Lay Judges in the European Union'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
  • Juries and Popular Culture

    Machura, S., 1 May 2025, (Accepted/In press) Research Handbook on Jury Decision Making. Hans, V. & Marder, N. (eds.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 23 p.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

  • Two Peas in a Pod? A Comprehensive Comparison of Juries and Mixed Tribunals

    Kutnjak Ivkovic, S. & Machura, S., 12 Jun 2025, (Accepted/In press) Research Handbook on Jury Decision Making. Hans, V. P. & Marder, N. S. (eds.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 27 p.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

  • “In the name of the people” ̶ Lay assessors in Germany

    Machura, S. & Rennig, C., 31 Jan 2021, Juries, Lay Judges, and Mixed Courts: A Global Perspective. Kutnjak Ivkovic, S., Diamond, S. S., Hans, V. P. & Marder, N. S. (eds.). Cambridge University Press, (ASCL Studies in Comparative Law).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Cite this