Resilience in older persons: A systematic review of the conceptual literature

M.J. Angevaare, Jen Roberts, Hein P.J. van Hout, M. Smalbrugge, L.J. Schoonmade, Gill Windle, C.M.P.M. Hertogh

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    531 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Although ageing research increasingly incorporates resilience, a common notion on what resilience means is lacking. We aimed to give a comprehensive overview of the conceptual literature on resilience in older persons, identifying areas of consensus and variation/debate. A systematic search of eight databases from different disciplines led to the inclusion of 36 texts.
    Across the conceptual literature of resilience in older persons, three common features of descriptions of resilience were identified: a stressor, a response and a mechanism. Based on differences in their interpretation of how resilience is expressed we distinguished two perspectives. The first, classical and most widely applied perspective, describes the expression of resilience as a positive response to a high intensity stressor. The second, newer perspective, describes resilience in the context of responses relative to equilibrium, following low intensity
    stressors. Almost all descriptions across the two perspectives describe the resilience mechanism to be dynamic and emphasize the importance of the context in achieving resilience.
    This review provides clarity on the current conceptual status of resilience in older persons, an important step towards a higher level of consistency in the future use of resilience in ageing.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number101144
    JournalAgeing Research Reviews
    Volume63
    Early online date22 Aug 2020
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2020

    Keywords

    • Resilience
    • Older persons
    • Ageing
    • Concept
    • Systematic review

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Resilience in older persons: A systematic review of the conceptual literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this