Activities per year
Abstract
While Gallo-Italic varieties clearly belong to the Romance language family, their
subgrouping as either Gallo-Romance or Italo-Romance has been the source of disagreement in the classificatory literature. While earlier analyses tended to classify Gallo-Italic as Gallo-Romance (notably Schmid, 1956; Bec, 1970-1971), later work has either argued for or tacitly assumed a classification of Gallo-Italic as part of the Italo-Romance branch, a view that is both different from as well as irreconcilable with the earlier Gallo-Romance classifications. In this paper we aim to contribute to the development of an empirically-based classification
of Gallo-Italic through the use of dialectometry applied to atlas corpora, and specifically through the measurement of Levenshtein distance. Using three wordlists (Swadesh 100, Swadesh 200, Leipzig-Jakarta) and comparing twenty-six linguistic varieties across Italy and south-eastern France, we show that Gallo-Italic is best classified as a third subgroup within the Gallo-Romance branch. Our results also clearly identify all the major bundles of isoglosses established through traditional dialectological methods and confirm Gallo-Italic as a relatively homogenous group distinct from Italo-Romance.
subgrouping as either Gallo-Romance or Italo-Romance has been the source of disagreement in the classificatory literature. While earlier analyses tended to classify Gallo-Italic as Gallo-Romance (notably Schmid, 1956; Bec, 1970-1971), later work has either argued for or tacitly assumed a classification of Gallo-Italic as part of the Italo-Romance branch, a view that is both different from as well as irreconcilable with the earlier Gallo-Romance classifications. In this paper we aim to contribute to the development of an empirically-based classification
of Gallo-Italic through the use of dialectometry applied to atlas corpora, and specifically through the measurement of Levenshtein distance. Using three wordlists (Swadesh 100, Swadesh 200, Leipzig-Jakarta) and comparing twenty-six linguistic varieties across Italy and south-eastern France, we show that Gallo-Italic is best classified as a third subgroup within the Gallo-Romance branch. Our results also clearly identify all the major bundles of isoglosses established through traditional dialectological methods and confirm Gallo-Italic as a relatively homogenous group distinct from Italo-Romance.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 442-455 |
| Journal | Digital Scholarship in the Humanities |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 24 Aug 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2018 |
Keywords
- Gallo-Italic, dialectometry, Levenshtein, Gallo-Romance, Italo-Romance, lexicostatistics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Revisiting the classification of Gallo-Italic: a dialectometric approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Activities
- 1 Invited talk
-
Linguistic and societal factors that affect the bilingual experience: two key dimensions
Tamburelli, M. (Invited speaker)
6 Mar 2025 → 8 Mar 2025Activity: Talk or presentation › Invited talk