ROSES RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps.

Neal R. Haddaway, Biljana Macura, Paul Whalley, Andrew S. Pullin

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    600 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Reliable synthesis of the various rapidly expanding bodies of evidence is vital for the process of evidence-informed decision-making in environmental policy, practice and research. With the rise of evidence-base medicine and increasing
    numbers of published systematic reviews, criteria for assessing the quality of reporting have been developed.
    First QUOROM (Lancet 354:1896–1900, 1999) and then PRISMA (Ann Intern Med 151:264, 2009) were developed as
    reporting guidelines and standards to ensure medical meta-analyses and systematic reviews are reported to a high
    level of detail. PRISMA is now widely used by a range of journals as a pre-submission checklist. However, due to its
    development for systematic reviews in healthcare, PRISMA has limited applicability for reviews in conservation and
    environmental management. We highlight 12 key problems with the application of PRISMA to this field, including
    an overemphasis on meta-analysis and no consideration for other synthesis methods. We introduce ROSES (RepOrting
    standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses), a pro forma and flow diagram designed specifically for systematic
    reviews and systematic maps in the field of conservation and environmental management. We describe how ROSES
    solves the problems with PRISMA. We outline the key benefits of our approach to designing ROSES, in particular the
    level of detail and inclusion of rich guidance statements. We also introduce the extraction of meta-data that describe
    key aspects of the conduct of the review. Collated together, this summary record can help to facilitate rapid review
    and appraisal of the conduct of a systematic review or map, potentially speeding up the peer-review process. We present
    the results of initial road testing of ROSES with systematic review experts, and propose a plan for future development
    of ROSES.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number7
    Number of pages8
    JournalEnvironmental Evidence
    Volume7
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 19 Mar 2018

    Keywords

    • PRISMA, Quality appraisal, CEESAT, DART, AMSTAR, QUORUM

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'ROSES RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this