Abstract
Archaeologists frequently call for stricter laws for archaeological heritage protection, in the hope that this will dissuade metal detectorists from pursuing their hobby. In this contribution, it is shown based on historical data that earlier tightening of legal restrictions on metal detecting in Austria has had no discernible effect on the increasing number of active metal detectorists. It is also argued that no significant possibility for further tightening of the law remains, because it is already at the limits of how tough it could have imaginably be made.
| Translated title of the contribution | Stricter laws for heritage protection? |
|---|---|
| Original language | German |
| Media of output | Science blog |
| Volume | 2018 |
| Publication status | Published - 11 Mar 2018 |
Publication series
| Name | Archäologische Denkmalpflege |
|---|---|
| ISSN (Print) | 2516-4309 |
Keywords
- Archaeology
- Heritage
- Heritage law
- Heritage management
- LAW
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Stricter laws for heritage protection?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.-
Against retention in situ: How to best preserve archaeology for 'future generations'?
Karl, R., 11 Feb 2018Research output: Other contribution
Open AccessFile -
Archäologische Denkmalpflege 1
Karl, R. (Editor), 31 Dec 2018, Archäologische Denkmalpflege. 470 p.Translated title of the contribution :Archaeological Heritage Management 1 Research output: Book/Report › Anthology
Open AccessFile -
Die Bewertung archäologischer Denkmale: In situ und ex situ, ex ante und ex post
Karl, R., 10 Feb 2018Translated title of the contribution :The value of archaeological monuments: In situ and ex situ, ex ante and ex post Research output: Other contribution
Open AccessFile
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver